Our findings show marked associations between severity of AA, atopic dermatitis, thyroid disease and other autoimmune diseases, and extensive family history of AA, suggesting two clinically distinct subtypes of AA with the severe subtype possibly associated with greater familial autoimmunity. Further research exploring the possibility of a genetic basis to explain these clinical findings will be helpful in clarifying our understanding of AA, leading to improvements in diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose In preclinical models, the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat sensitizes breast cancer cells to tubulin polymerizing agents and to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) directed therapies. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of vorinostat plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and the biological effects of vorinostat in vivo. Patients and Methods Fifty-four patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy for MBC received vorinostat (200 or 300 mg PO BID) on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, plus paclitaxel (90mg/m2) on days 2, 9, 16 and bevacizumab (10mg/kg) on days 2 and 16 every 28 days. The primary objective of the phase I study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of vorinostat, and for the phase II to detect an improvement of response rate from 40% to 60% (alpha =0.10, beta=0.10). Results No dose limiting toxicities were observed, and the RPTD of vorinostat was 300 mg BID. For the primary efficacy analysis in 44 patients at the RPTD, we observed 24 objective responses (55%, 95% confidence intervals [C.I.] 39%, 70%). The adverse event profile was consistent with paclitaxel-bevacizumab, with the exception of increased diarrhea with the addition of vorinostat. Analysis of serial tumor biopsies in 7 patients showed increased acetylation of Hsp 90 and -tubulin following vorinostat. Conclusions Vorinostat induces histone and alpha tubulin acetylation and functional inhibition of Hsp90 in breast cancer in vivo and can be safely combined with paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

14040 Background: We are conducting a phase II trial of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341, with or without irinotecan in pts with AGA. The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan has been studied in preclinical tumor models including a murine xenograft model of colon cancer, where the combination achieved significantly more tumor shrinkage than either agent alone. The primary objective of this study is to determine response rates, toxicities, progression-free survival, and overall survival in pts with AGA receiving PS-341 alone or in combination with irinotecan. Methods: All pts had gastric adenocarcinoma beyond the scope of surgical resection, measurable disease, and normal bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. All gave informed consent. In previously untreated patients, PS-341 was administered at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 as IV bolus every 21 days. Irinotecan was administered IV at 125 mg/m2 over 90 mins on days 1 and 8 every 21 days (Arm A). For previously treated patients, PS-341 was administered as a single agent at 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11 as an IV bolus every 21 days (Arm B). Radiologic evaluation and tumor measurements were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Thirty-seven pts have been enrolled; 29 are evaluable (4 never treated, 4 TETE). Twenty-two pts were treated in Arm A, and 11 in Arm B. All pts were eligible and the 29 treated pts were fully evaluable. Median age 58 (33–87); 26 males/7 females; median number of cycles received was 2.0. Most common toxicities: Grade 4 cardiac arrest (1), stomach perforation (1), leukopenia (2), diarrhea (1), edema (1); Grade 3 nausea (6), vomiting (7), diarrhea (4), febrile neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (6), anemia (6); Grade 5 death (3). Severe toxicities likely attributed to disease progression. Response rate was 33% for Arm A, 9% for Arm B. Progression-free survival was 1.8 mo. in Arm A, 1.4 mo. in Arm B. Median overall survival was 4.8 mo. in Arm A, 5.4 mo. in Arm B. Conclusions: The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan, a non-cisplatin containing therapy, is active in AGA and should be considered a key regimen. Monotherapy with PS-341 has a 9% response rate in this population of pre-treated patients with advanced disease. Accrual to this study is continuing. [Table: see text]