Objective
This study investigated the incidence of epilepsy and identified neonatal risk morbidities for epilepsy in children born extremely preterm.
Methods
Of the 806 very preterm infants (birth weight < 1500 g, gestational age < 32 weeks) who survived and were discharged from the four neonatal intensive care units in southern Taiwan between 2003 and 2012, 686 (85.1%) had longitudinal neurodevelopmental follow‐up assessments up to 5 years of age.
Results
Among the 686 very preterm children, 19 (2.8%) exhibited epilepsy at a mean age of 19 ± 14 months. The incidence of epilepsy was highest among infants with neonatal seizure (33%), followed by cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL, 27%), high‐grade intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH, 21%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stage III (20%). NEC stage III, neonatal seizure, high‐grade IVH, and cPVL were also independent neonatal risk morbidities for epilepsy. Furthermore, the incidence of epilepsy was 21.6% in preterm children with significant neonatal brain injury (SNBI; ie, high‐grade IVH and cPVL), but only 1% in preterm children without SNBI. Among preterm children with SNBI, neonatal seizure was higher in preterm children with epilepsy than in those without epilepsy (23.1% vs 2.1%, P = .03). Among preterm children without SNBI, NEC stage III was higher in preterm children with epilepsy than in those without epilepsy (33.3% vs 1.8%, P < .01). The preterm children with epilepsy were prone to have neurodevelopmental disability regardless of whether they had neonatal brain injury, and drug‐resistant epilepsy (42%), particularly those with neonatal high‐grade IVH.
Significance
There is an elevated incidence of epilepsy among very preterm children, and particularly those with significant brain injury and/or severe NEC during the neonatal period. Very preterm children with epilepsy are prone to have neurodevelopmental disability and drug‐resistant epilepsy.
Serial monitoring corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis size in early life of very preterm babies may predict the motor or mentality neurological outcome at 5 years of age.
Background: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is one of the most common autoimmune encephalitis in children. Most children recovered well after anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. However, the NMDA receptor network functions are critical for the developing brain in children. The long-term consequences in pediatric patients of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis are very infrequently reported. Methods: This case series study retrospectively enrolled 10 children aged below 18 years old with antibody-proved anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in a tertiary medical center from 2010 to 2019. Long-term neurological consequences of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in children were followed. Results: One boy and nine girls were enrolled with a median onset age of 3.6 years. The most common initial presentation was verbal reduction and psychiatric symptoms soon after some flu-like prodromal symptoms. Nearly all patients then developed decreased level of consciousness, mutism, seizures and orofacial-lingual dyskinesia. Autonomic instability occurred in 5 patients, particularly in pre-pubertal children. Only one adolescent patient had ovarian teratoma. All patients survived after immunotherapy and were followed for 5.8 AE 3.3 years after discharge. Four had epilepsy within 2 years after encephalitis, four had a cognitive deficit, one had mild psychiatric symptoms of hallucination, and none had residual involuntary movements. Moreover, two pre-pubertal children developed central precocious puberty about 3 years after encephalitis, and one required gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Conclusion: Central precocious puberty could be a consequence of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in the pre-pubertal children. The pediatrician should pay attention to its occurrence at follow-up.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.