Triple-negative breast cancer, defined as that with negative expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and cerbB2, accounted for 11% of invasive breast cancers in our study, drawn from an original cohort of 7048 women diagnosed with breast cancer from the files of the Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, over 14 years. Women with triple-negative breast cancer were generally postmenopausal, with adverse pathological characteristics of high histological grade and frequent nodal metastases. Using a set of 61 invasive breast cancers earlier profiled into molecular subtypes with expression arrays, we defined specificity and sensitivity values for different immunohistochemical panels of basal keratins (CK5/6, CK14, CK17, 34 beta E12), CD117, EGFR, p63 and SMA in defining basal-like breast cancer. Subsequent application of a tri-panel of CK14, EGFR and 34 beta E12 (specificity 100% and sensitivity 78%) to our group of 653 triple-negative breast cancers delineated 84% to be basal-like. Immunohistochemical expression of individual biological markers correlated with unfavorable pathological parameters. We conclude that triple-negative breast cancers in an Asian population harbor adverse pathobiological features, and an immunohistochemical surrogate panel can be reliably used to define basal-like cancers among them.

Treatment of triple-negative invasive breast cancers, defined by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and c-erbB2 expression, remains challenging. Androgen receptor, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that is involved in signaling pathways regulating cell proliferation, has been implicated in breast tumorigenesis. We immunohistochemically examined the expression of androgen receptor, basal markers (CK14, 34bE12) and EGFR in 699 triple-negative invasive breast cancers in tissue microarrays using the streptavidin-biotin method, and correlated the findings with clinical outcome. Positive androgen receptor expression was defined as staining of 1% or more of tumor cell nuclei. Survival outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with log-rank statistics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effect of androgen receptor on survival outcomes. Immunohistochemical positivity was observed in 38% of tumors, with the proportion of stained tumor cells ranging from 1 to 95% (mean 29%, median 10%). Androgen receptor expression was inversely associated with histologic grade and mitotic score. CK14, 34bE12 and EGFR confirmed 85% of cases to be basal-like, without significant association of basal-like phenotype with androgen receptor expression. Disease-free survival was significantly better in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer, with a trend for improved overall survival. Decreased recurrence likelihood in both triple-negative and basal-like tumors (hazard ratio, 0.704; 95% confidence intervals, 0.498-0.994; P ¼ 0.0464; and hazard ratio, 0.675; 95% confidence intervals, 0.468-0.974; P ¼ 0.0355, respectively) was noted within 5 years of diagnosis but not thereafter. Our study suggests that loss of androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancers augurs a worse prognosis, including those with basal-like features. More work in elucidating its relationship with mechanisms of progression, as well as trials of targeted treatment for androgen receptor-expressing triple-negative tumors, needs to be performed.

We earlier evaluated the relationship of 653 triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) with basal immunophenotypic expression by using antibodies to basal cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14, CK17, 34betaE12), p63, smooth muscle actin (SMA), epidermal growth factor receptor, and CD117, and found that a triple panel of CK14, 34betaE12 and epidermal growth factor receptor determined 84% of our cases to be basal-like. Women with basal-like TNBC tended to be younger (P=0.04), have histologically higher-grade tumors (P=0.047), with positive nodal status (P=0.047), than those whose tumors were nonbasal-like. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, tumor size (P=0.003), histologic grade (P=0.006), and nodal status (P=0.017) were significant factors for disease-free survival (DFS) among TNBC, whereas age (P=0.004), tumor size (P=0.001), histologic grade (P<0.001), nodal status (P=0.011), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.032), and pushing borders (P=0.042) were important for overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, age was statistically significant for both DFS and OS (P=0.033, 0.001 respectively), whereas histologic grade was important for OS (P<0.001). Kaplan Meier curves showed CK17 positivity to impact adversely on DFS (P=0.003) and OS (P=0.014), whereas CD117 positive staining was accompanied by diminished OS (P=0.036). SMA expression in TNBC however, revealed a trend for improved DFS (P=0.05). Our findings indicate that basal-like TNBC are associated with adverse clinicopathologic parameters, and that individual biologic markers of CK17, CD117, and SMA have prognostic implications on survival. Possibilities exist for future targeted therapy for this challenging group of breast cancers.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and c-ERBB2 (HER2/neu) are therapeutically and prognostically important markers in the management of breast carcinoma. They are not always analyzed in distant metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancers. We compared immunohistochemical expression in a series of primary breast carcinomas with their distant metastases (n = 72) and local recurrences (n = 45) and analyzed the impact of any changes on survival. Discordance rates between primary and metastatic and between primary and locally recurrent lesions, respectively, were 18% (13/72) and 13% (6/45) for ER, 42% (30/72) and 33% (15/45) for PR, and 7% (5/72) and 2% (1/45) for c-ERBB2. There was statistically significant discordance between primary and metastatic PR status (P = .017; kappa = 0.201). Among locally recurrent tumors, 15 (33%) of 45 revealed discordance for PR (P = .006; kappa = 0.366). We observed a trend for shorter survival among women with ER- metastatic and locally recurrent tumors regardless of the primary tumor ER status. Our findings suggest a benefit for routine evaluation of ER, PR, and c-ERBB2 status in distant metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer for therapeutic and prognostic purposes.

The use of keratins as an adjunctive immunohistochemical diagnostic tool in the differential work-up of spindle cell tumours of the breast has to be interpreted with caution especially on limited core biopsy material.