The essay analyzes representations of neoliberal labour in two films by the U.S. filmmaker Ramin Bahrani: Man Push Cart (2005) and Chop Shop (2007). By focusing on working-class labour in New York’s informal economy, the films undermine the prevalent characterization of contemporary labour as “immaterial” and fundamentally new. The essay argues that, in the latter film, the Willets Point neighbourhood appears as an area of “uneven development,” which gives the working-class characters a modicum of autonomy and a chance to transform their spaces. Yet the films’ greatest strength is their resistance to clichéd representations of working-class characters as oppressed “others”—objects of ethnographic fascination and paternalistic sympathy. Instead, Bahrani encourages the audience’s identification with the characters by using innovative filmmaking practice and focusing on the structures of “entrepreneurial governmentality,” usually associated with white-collar work. Bahrani’s films also highlight the contradictions of contemporary filmmaking and neoliberal culture.

No abstract

No abstract

This introduction to the special issue on “Contemporary Labor and Cultural Exchange” argues for the importance of the category of labor to the study of contemporary transnational literatures and cultures. Responding to dominant discourses on globalization as well as the debate about “world literature” within literary studies, the introduction suggests that increased attention to the routes of labor migration and cultural representations of exploited migrant labor offers a new, productive approach to the study of contemporary literature and culture. In contrast to the celebratory rhetoric of globalization which represents a “flat” and democratically interconnected world, the focus on labor migration brings to light the persistence of uneven development and exploitation, and the frequent isolation of migrant workers, even as the surplus value they generate plays a major role in the global economy. Written at a time when many U.S.‐based universities are adopting the neoliberal practices of global corporations, the attention to labor in literary and cultural studies also places an emphasis on the material conditions of academic production and scholars' embeddedness in economic processes. An approach to transnational literature which follows the cartography of labor migration and uneven development could become a vital alternative to the “world literature” curriculum which tends to disregard economic inequality.