Nanocarriers passively accumulate in solid tumors through irregular wide fenestrations in neovasculature and increased retention due to poor lymphatic drainage, a phenomenon termed the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect. Although several preclinical reports have described the role of EPR in nanomedicine, its role in human solid tumor is obscure. There are several distinct factors for tumors in mice versus humans, including size, heterogeneity and nanomedicine pharmacokinetics. This review focuses on preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating the role of the EPR effect and passive targeting. The article illustrates the gaps that limit clinical effectiveness of the EPR effect and elaborates strategies to boost its efficiency, relaying future clinical outcomes for designing clinically applicable EPR-based nanomedicine.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract