Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using a nephrostomy tube as a drainage has been considered the standard procedure. However, recently many literatures have reported the use of tubeless and totally tubeless drainage following PCNL with excellent results. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE databases to review each drainage technique following PCNL (tubeless, totally tubeless, or nephrostomy tube) and also to assess the most recent evidence that compare the safety of these drainage procedures with a clear-cut clinical parameter imposed. Tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL is significantly superior to standard PCNL in terms of length of hospital stay, postoperative pain (visual analog scale) score, demands or dosage of analgesics required, as well as faster return to activity for the patients. However, despite the many advantages of tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL over standard PCNL, there are a number of situations requiring the consideration of nephrostomy tube placement. Nonetheless, decision to use or not to use nephrostomy tube after PCNL depends on the surgeon's experience and clinical judgment.
BackgroundTo evaluate tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) infiltration and microvessel density as possible prognostic factors related to prostate cancer (PCa) progression.MethodsImmunostaining of TAMs in prostate biopsy specimens was performed using a monoclonal antibody CD68 and microvessel density (MVD) using von Willebrand factor (vWF) from 25 specimens with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and 25 specimens with PCa after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Six microscopic (×200) fields were selected for TAM counting and six microscopic (×100) fields were selected for MVD counting around the cancer foci. Association between age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic Gleason sum (GS), TAM, MVD, extracapsular extension, and metastasis were assessed using Pearson/Spearman, Student t test/Mann-Whitney U test and one-way analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis test.ResultsThe mean of age, PSA, TAMs, and MVD were 69.1 ± 9.9, 67.1 ± 92.4, 26.2 ± 11.9, and 31.4 ± 14.0, respectively, from 50 specimens with PCa and HGPIN. Increasing TAMs number was not correlated with increasing MVD number and there was no significant mean difference statistically (P > 0.05) in TAMs and MVD although the mean of TAMs number was higher in PCa versus HGPIN but significant in PSA level (P < 0.001). In PCa specimens, age, PSA, TAMs, and MVD number were higher in patients with metastatic and extracapsular extension, but not significant statistically (P > 0.005). There was no correlation between TAMs and MVD (P > 0.001).ConclusionsTAMs and MVD had increased PCa but did not provide independent prognostic value. Increasing numbers of TAMs was not always followed by an increase in MVD. HGPIN is the most likely precursor for PCa.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare long term follow-up of sexual dysfunction between end-to-end anastomosis or buccal mucosa graft in short segment bulbar urethral stricture. Material & Method: We performed a meta analysis of cohort study. The data sources was MEDLINE from 1980 through 2011. A fixed effects model with Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled Risk Ratio (RRs) and 95% Confidence Interval (CIs). We assessed the heterogeneity by calculating the I2 statistic. All analyses were performed with Stata statistical software, version 10.0 (Stata Corp). Results: We analyzed 6 cohort studies. End-to-end anastomosis and buccal mucosa graft patients who complained about sexual dysfunction were 24.6% (45/183) and 9.1% (11/122) respectively, with overall RR 2.54 (95% CI, 0.22-0.69, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Buccal mucosa graft showed a superior outcome compared to end-to-end anastomosis, based on sexual dysfunction in ≤ 3 cm bulbar urethral stricture treatments.Keywords: Sexual dysfunction, end-to-end anastomosis, buccal mucosa graft, anterior urethral stricture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.