CO2 sequestration and storage into methane (CH4) hydrate sediments is investigated in this study to evaluate CH4 replacement by CO2 in hydrates through both macroscale and microscale experiments at varying thermodynamic conditions. The kinetics of CO2-CH4 replacement in hydrates was experimentally evaluated using the production/CO2 sequestration setup within the methane hydrate stability zone (HSZ) and within (HSZ-I)/outside the CO2 HSZ (HSZ-II). These results were further extended at the microscale using a visual glass micromodel to validate the CH4-replacement/CO2 storage kinetics in presence of a commercial Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor (KHI) to explore the feasibility of KHI for mitigation of CO2 hydrate blockage during CO2 injection. Up to 71% CH4 gas recovery was obtained in the macroscale excess gas experiments within the HSZ-II, whereas the higher water saturation condition diminished this CH4 recovery by 9.3%. Deep inside the HSZ-I, a significant CH4 production of 51.7% was obtained (at frozen conditions) with 1% of an inhibitor application in water.For the first time ever, our novel microscale micromodel evaluations clearly revealed the release of CH4 gas through the convection, slow CO2 diffusive mass transfer and the CO2-CH4 replacement, within the HSZ-I. Moreover, this process potentially benefits from the long-term permanent CO2 sequestration and storage in the form of clathrate hydrates while offsetting the cost of its injection through the clean energy methane recovery.
The oil recovery process is controlled by the rates of gas injection and oil production, relative permeabilities, reservoir heterogeneities and the balance among viscous, capillary and gravity forces. Crestal gas injection in horizontal, vertical or reef type oil reservoirs recovers significant volumes of the residual oil due to the gas-oil gravity drainage mechanism, indicating the significance of gravity forces. This study investigates the effects of the parameters that control the process (e.g., rate of the gas injection and oil production) and reservoir heterogeneities on the overall performance of immiscible gravity drainage enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Reservoir simulation studies are conducted to map effective combinations of these parameters with respect to the oil recovery performance.
Introduction
Gravity forces play an important role at nearly every stage of the producing life of the reservoir, whether it is primary depletion, secondary water or gas injection schemes or tertiary enhanced or improved oil recovery methods(1). They can be advantageously used to maximize oil recovery from the oil bearing zone under investigation through gravity drainage mechanism. Several cases reported in the literature suggest that it could deliver as high as 87 to 95% incremental oil recoveries in contrast to other gas injection EOR methods.
Gas-Oil Gravity Drainage Process
Gravity drainage is a process in which gravity acts as a main driving force and where gas replaces voidage volume(2). It is commonly implemented in either of the dipping or pinnacle reef type reservoirs.
CO2-assisted gravity drainage EOR process is a top-down process in which gas is injected in the gas cap through vertical wells at a rate lower than the critical rate (Figure 1). Critical rate is the rate at which injection gas fingers through oil zone (viscous instabilities) leading to its premature breakthrough at the production wells. Injected gas segregates and creates a gas-oil interface. Controlled oil production is started through horizontal wells placed at the bottom of the oil zone such that the voidage created by oil withdrawal (in addition to minor dissolved volumes) is replaced by the equivalent CO2 injection volume. When this happens, pressure differential across the gas cap and oil zone [that is gas-oil contact (GOC)] stay at or close to zero implying that the pressure in the gas zone behind the CO2 floodfront would be constant(3). This helps to maintain the reservoir pressure nearly constant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.