Objective: To review the experience of our institution in repairing isolated iliac artery aneurysm (isolated IAA) in the
last 10 years.
Introduction: Unlike abdominal and combined aortoiliac artery aneurysms, isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs) are uncommon. An isolated
iliac artery aneurysm is dened as a twofold increase in the diameter of the iliac artery without a coexisting aneurysm at another location. IIAA
was encountered infrequently in the past, comprising 0.9% to 4.7% of all intra-abdominal aneurysms according to a review of previous studies;
however, in recent times, many asymptomatic IIAAs have been detected incidentally because of the widespread use of abdominal
ultrasonography and computed tomography.
Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent isolated IAA repair at Institute of vascular sciences, MMC and RGGGH, Chennai,
India, were reviewed, to obtain information on patients' demographics, vascular risk factors, type of treatment and outcome
Results: A total of 13 patients with 18 aneurysms, 11 men(84.6%) 2 women(15.4%), with a mean age of 58.1±6 years, and two paediatric
patients of age 11yrs (Female) and 3 months (Male) were treated. The mean diameter was 4.6 ± 1.0 for non-ruptured at elective repair; 5.5±2.1 cm
on the emergency cases. The majority of aneurysms were at the common iliac artery. All of them except one, underwent open repair.Ten (84%)
had elective operations, and two (16%) emergency repair for ruptured aneurysm.
Hypertension and diabetes were seen as the most common risk factors with most of the patients were smokers. One was a known case of CKD
and the paediatric female was a known case of RHD. There was one postoperative death in this series, patient succumbed on POD 1.
Conclusion: This case series reviews the literature with regard to the natural history, diagnostic workup, and treatment of iliac artery aneurysms.
For patients undergoing elective repair, preoperative imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance is advocated. Repair is
recommended for good-risk patients with aneurysms larger than 3.5 cm as there is high chances of rupture with increasing diameter.
Objectives
The aims of this study were to establish the use of single-dose prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in the prevention of postoperative wound infection following clean surgeries in a government setup in India and to assess the efficacy of single-dose prophylactic ceftriaxone in preventing surgical site infection following clean surgeries by a prospective randomized trial.
Methods
A prospective study was done on patients in the Department of General Surgery in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India, from January 2011 to December 2014. A total of 822 patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group (A), consisting of 406 patients, received a single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, and the second group (B), consisting of 416 patients, received 3 days or more of postoperative doses of antibiotic therapy. Only clean procedures are included, and results were compared.
Results
In the first group (A), the rate of infection was 4 of 406. In the second group (B), the rate of infection was 6 of 416. Overall wound infection rate was 0.95%; wound infection rate after administration of single-dose preoperative antibiotic was 0.96%, and in the routine postoperative group, it was 0.94% (P = 0.9).
Conclusions
This study concludes that single-dose preoperative antibiotic alone is as effective as the use of empiric antibiotics given for 3 days or more in clean surgeries. It will facilitate in decreasing superinfections among and resistance to bacterial strains, health care costs, and morbidity secondary to antibiotic administration (eg, drug toxicity, antibiotic-related diarrhea) in a developing country such as India.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.