OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of the early use of the vacuum erection device (VED) on erectile dysfunction (ED) and penile shortening after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP), as these are important concerns for men choosing among treatment alternatives for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty‐eight men undergoing RP were randomized to early intervention (1 month after RP, group 1) or a control group (6 months after RP, group 2) using a traditional VED protocol. An International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score of >11 (no, mild or mild to moderate ED) was required as a baseline criterion for inclusion in the study. Only patients in whom unilateral or bilateral nerves were spared were subsequently randomized. Patients in group 1 followed a daily rehabilitation protocol consisting of 10 min/day using the VED with no constriction ring, for 5 months. Patients were evaluated with the IIEF‐5 questionnaire and measurements of penile flaccid length, stretched length, prepubic fat pad, and midshaft circumference before and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after RP; the mean (range) last follow‐up visit was 9.5 (6–12) months after RP. RESULTS The mean (sd) baseline IIEF scores were similar in groups 1 and 2, at 21.1 (4.6) and 22.3 (3.3), respectively (P = 0.54). The IIEF scores were significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 at 3 months, at 11.5 (9.4) vs 1.8 (1.4) (P = 0.008) and at 6 months, at 12.4 (8.7) vs 3.0 (1.9) (P = 0.012) after RP. There were no significant changes in penile flaccid length, prepubic fat pad, or mid‐shaft circumference in either group. Stretched penile length was significantly decreased at both 3 and 6 months, by ≈ 2 cm (P = 0.013) in group 2. By contrast, stretched penile length was preserved in group 1 at all sample times. At the last follow‐up, the proportion of men with a mean loss of penile length of ≥ 2 cm was significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 (two/17, 12%, vs five/11, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Initiating the use of a VED protocol at 1 month after RP improves early sexual function and helps to preserve penile length.

Serum prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase levels were measured retrospectively and evaluated in 357 men with benign prostatic hypertrophy and in 209 men with various stages of prostatic carcinoma. Although prostatic specific antigen values were elevated in 21 per cent of the patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy, the elevations usually were low and did not interfere with clinical interpretation. Prostatic specific antigen was elevated in 98 per cent of 86 men with active stage D2 disease; in 22 per cent of the men prostatic specific antigen was the only elevated marker. In contrast, prostatic acid phosphatase was the only elevated marker in 1 per cent of the patients with stage D2 disease and neither marker was elevated in 2 per cent. Among 74 patients in whom prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase determinations were made before radical prostatectomy, prostatic specific antigen was elevated substantially (greater than 10 ng. per ml.) in 59 per cent (26 of 44) with extracapsular disease and in only 7 per cent (2 of 30) without extracapsular disease. More importantly, of those 28 patients with substantially elevated prostatic specific antigen levels 26 (93 per cent) had extracapsular disease. Serial serum measurements showed that prostatic specific antigen either reflected or predicted clinical status in more than 97 per cent of the patients. We conclude that prostatic specific antigen is an excellent serum tumor marker for monitoring patients with prostatic carcinoma and that it surpasses prostatic acid phosphatase in this regard. Prostatic specific antigen also may be useful in staging prostatic carcinoma and it may change our attitudes significantly about the therapeutic responses to this cancer.

We evaluated the location of recurrent disease in 63 patients with carcinoma of the prostate who had abnormal levels of prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.4 ng./ml., Tandem-R assay) 6 to 240 months after radical prostatectomy but who were otherwise considered to be without evidence of disease. The evaluation involved physical examination including digital rectal examinations by 3 urologists, isotopic bone scans, computerized tomography scans of the abdomen and pelvis, cystoscopy, and random needle biopsies of the urethrovesical anastomotic area. In 6 patients metastatic disease to the bone and/or lymph nodes was found and local prostate cancer was discovered in 5. Among 57 patients without evidence of disease by the usual methods of evaluation needle biopsies of the anastomosis revealed local disease in 42%. No local disease was discovered in 30 post-radical prostatectomy patients with normal prostate specific antigen levels. There was a wide range of transrectally palpable contours after radical prostatectomy in patients with and without elevated prostate specific antigen levels. We conclude that prostate specific antigen but not digital rectal examination is an excellent early indicator of possible local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Whether the prevalence of local disease after radical prostatectomy using prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsies of the anastomosis is greater than heretofore has been appreciated will require further study.

Cathepsin B (CB) has been shown to degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and has been reported to be involved in invasion and metastasis of several types of solid organ tumors in human and animals, but CB has not been studied in human prostate cancer (CAP). Our objective was to determine the CB protein immunostaining pattern in CAP and to correlate the immunostaining with the degree of malignancy as reflected in the Gleason grading system. We used two types of CB antibodies (namely, monospecific, polyclonal antibodies to human liver CB prepared in rabbits, and polyclonal antibody produced in sheep) to establish CB localization patterns in neoplastic prostate. Our analysis showed a heterogeneous CB immunostaining pattern in the neoplastic human prostate. CB immunostaining occurred in many, but not all, of the neoplastic columnar/cuboidal cells of acini and isolated cells, i.e., in small ragged glands and clusters (groups) of invasive cells in the prostatic stroma. We have shown that, in general, there was a positive correlation of the intensity of CB immunostaining with the Gleason histologic score (or Gleason grade sum) tumors, i.e., from the lowest scores through score 8, but many of the tumors with scores 9 and 10 showed little CB immunostaining. Our study indicated that the increased CB immunostaining in the Gleason grade sum 5-8 tumors may be associated with increased degradation of ECM, but not in 9 and 10 despite the fact that the latter tumors are more malignant clinically. In well-differentiated tumors, fewer CB immunostaining cells were present than the moderately-differentiated tumors. In other words, most of the stromal invasion of the prostatic ECM occurred in tumors of Gleason grade sums 5-8. We suggest that CB immunostaining might be a useful method to assess stromal invasion of prostatic carcinoma, especially in the higher grade tumors.