Numerous COVID-19 vaccines are being administered to people around the world. Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with COVID-19 vaccines have been reported by health care workers as well as surveillance bodies. A wealth of information on the efficacy and safety of vaccines exists in the literature, and the knowledge in this sector is growing exponentially. A narrative literature review was conducted on sources accessed from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Review from March 2021 to July 2021. This review is aimed at describing AEFI associated with currently available COVID-19 vaccines, with an emphasis on narrating probable AEFI, and at assisting in a better understanding of the COVID-19 vaccines.

No abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis, also known as kala-azar is one of the most commonly neglected tropical diseases affecting a large number of rural and resource-limited people in South Asia, Africa, and South America. Paromomycin, an aminoglycoside drug, is frequently used for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Despite limited therapies for visceral leishmaniasis and emerging drug resistance, a proper review on the action of paromomycin for kala-azar is lacking. This systematic review aims to look for the efficacy and safety aspects of paromomycin for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis.

No abstract

The neutrophil-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (NHR) is thought to reflect inflammatory status and dyslipidaemia, both of which play significant roles in coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this narrative review is to summarise the results of studies that have explored the utility of NHR for the diagnosis and management of CAD. The PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for articles related to NHR from their inception to October 2022. Seven relevant articles were obtained for review. There were unclear relationships of NHR with age, sex, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes. However, NHR had a sensitivity and specificity as high as 94.8% and 59%, respectively, for the identification of significant coronary stenosis. NHR was also a superior predictor of prognosis to conventional parameters. NHR had a sensitivity and specificity as high as 77.6% and 74.2%, respectively, for the prediction of adverse events, including mortality, associated with acute coronary syndrome. Thus, NHR could be used in clinical cardiovascular medicine for risk stratification and the prediction of the short-term and long-term outcomes of CAD. However, more studies are required before a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of NHR for use in patient management can be completed.