Background:
Craniosynostosis correction surgery is a complex procedure, which involves complete dismantling and reassembly of the cranial vault components. The traditional planning method for these surgeries results in increased intra-operative time owing to its highly subjective nature. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) platform has lead to a greater pre-operative insight and precision outcome in calvarial remodeling surgeries. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate intra-operative time and blood loss difference as a measure of surgical efficiency between VSP based template guided Anterior Cranial Vault Reconstruction (ACVR) with Fronto-Orbital Unit Advancement (FOUA) and the traditional surgeries.
Methods:
Data were collected from patients who underwent ACVR with FOUA in our unit. Patients were divided into 2 groups, Template Fronto-Orbital Unit (TFOU) group and Non-template Fronto-Orbital Unit (NFOU) group. In TFOU group, Virtual planning along with fabrication of Template guide was carried out. Patients undergoing ACVR using traditional techniques were categorized as NFOU group. A comparative prospective analysis was carried out in terms of Intra-operative time duration and blood loss. Student ‘t’ test was used to compare the means of the 2 groups.
Results:
A total of 10 patients were included in the present study. There were 5 control (NFOU) and 5 TFOU cases. There was a significant decrease in the operating time in TFOU group compared to the NFOU group. TFOU group also showed reduced intra-operative bleed compared to the NFOU group.
Conclusion:
Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D modeling with prefabricated template guide augurs reliable outcomes and portends the possibility of lesser intra-operative time. It is a valuable tool, which offers enormous benefits in terms of precise pre-surgical planning with predictive results.
Three-dimensional virtual surgery programs are widely available for orthognathic surgery. The advent of imaging software programs has proved to be useful for diagnosis, treatment planning, outcome measurement, and three-dimensional surgical simulation. Complex maxillofacial malformations continue to present challenges in analysis and correction beyond modern technology. Orthomorphic correction for mandibular dysmorphology refers to basal bone movement without any change in dental component. The purpose of this paper is to present a virtual surgery planning for surgeons to perform the orthomorphic surgery with precision and quantification. Moreover, it provides an essential educational tool for patients to foresee predicted surgical outcome.
Ossifying fibroma is a rare benign osteogenic neoplasm arising from undifferentiated cells of the periodontal ligament. Ossifying fibroma have a well-defined border that differentiates it from fibrous dysplasia clinically; these tumors manifest as a round or ovoid, expansile, painless, slow-growing mass may displace the roots of adjacent teeth and also cause root resorption. A variety of approaches for resection of the maxilla have been described. Most involve the use of facial and lip-splitting incisions to gain wide access. Surgical approach specifically to the ossifying fibroma located in the midface includes the Le Fort I approach, Caldwell-Luc access, lateral rhinotomy with medial or total maxillectomy, external ethmoidectomy, and endoscopic surgery. The access through Le Fort I disassembly is a versatile approach not only because of the aesthetic potential in using intraoral incision but also due to its minimal invasiveness, lesser complications and gives the possibility of reconstruction in a single operation. Le Fort I disassembly followed by an excision appears to be a versatile, secure, and satisfactory option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.