Background: Commonest approach in emergency open abdominal surgeries remains to be midline laparotomy because it is simple, saves time and causes minimal blood loss. Optimal technique for laparotomy wound closure has been a topic of debate since long. Risk factors for development of incisional hernia and burst abdomen are wound infection, systemic illnesses of patient and closure technique. Factors related to patients like age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systemic illnesses are not modifiable when an emergency laparotomy is the only option. Hence closure technique is one factor where surgeon has total control, which can bring down the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional hernias.Methods: Prospective study conducted in 150 patients who underwent emergency midline laparotomy from December 2014 to February 2016 in Krishna Rajendra Hospital attached to Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India with 6 months’ follow-up after surgery.Results: Most of patients in the study belonged to 30-40-year group and were males (78%). Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis (52%) was the single most common indication for emergency midline laparotomy. In the continuous and interrupted groups, post-operative wound infection was found in 54.6% and 34.6%, wound dehiscence was found in 16% and 6.6% and incisional hernia in 14.4% and 4% respectively.Conclusions: Interrupted suturing is superior to continuous technique in emergency midline laparotomy wound closure in terms of complications and post-operative morbidity.

Background: There have been many attempts to find less painful surgical methods for treating haemorrhoids. Harmonic scalpel is a device that simultaneously cuts and coagulates soft tissues through ultrasonic vibrations. The aim of this study was to compare the results of Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy with conventional Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids.Methods: Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids, operated between January 2016 and December 2016, using the harmonic scalpel (n=30) or the conventional open technique (n=30) were studied. Both the groups were compared with respect to Operative time, Blood loss during surgery, early postoperative complications, postoperative pain measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), hospital stay, and return to normal work.Results: Harmonic scalpel and conventional open haemorrhoidectomy patients differ significantly in terms of VAS score of postoperative pain, blood loss during surgery, early post-operative complications, return to normal work. However, there is no significant difference in terms of duration of surgery and hospital stay in both the groups.Conclusions: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy has been found advantageous method when assessing the amount of bleeding intraoperatively, post-operative pain, early postoperative complications, and Return to normal work. Hence Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternate method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids.

Background:Mass in right iliac fossa is a very common condition a surgeon will come across in day to day practise. This study was aimed at assessing various symptoms with which subjects with mass in right iliac fossa present to clinician.Methods: 50 eligible subjects admitted in K. R. Hospital who were diagnosed to have mass in right iliac fossa clinically or radiologically were selected after informed valid consent. A proper history, thorough clinical examination and relevant investigations were done to diagnose the pathology. Various symptoms were assessed.Results:In our study, the various conditions which presented as mass in right iliac fossa were appendicular mass (42%), appendicular abscess (16%), ileocaecal tuberculosis (24%), carcinoma caecum (14%), ileopsoas abscess (4%). Various symptoms with which subjects presented were pain abdomen (88%), fever (78%), vomiting (30%), mass per abdomen (28%), weight loss (38%), bleeding per rectum (12%) and bowel disturbances (16%). Appendicular pathology was most common cause in younger age group and carcinoma caecum and ileocaecal TB was more prevalent in older age group.Conclusions:Various symptoms with which subjects presented were pain abdomen, fever, vomiting, mass per abdomen, weight loss, bleeding per rectum and bowel disturbances. Pain abdomen was the most common symptom in subjects with mass in right iliac fossa. Mass per abdomen as a symptom was found in 28% of the subjects.

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer is a very common condition encountered in surgical practise. Wound management pose a good challenge for a treating surgeon due to its physical, mental and social implications. The devitalised necrotic tissue present in ulcer does not favour the wound healing as it increases the chance of infection and delays appearance of granulation tissue. Hence debriding of devitalised tissue plays a key role in wound care. In present study ,we used papain urea based preparation in dressings which is a autolytic agent. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of use of papain urea based preparations compared with regular conventional dressing in diabetic foot ulcer management.Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in K. R. Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 60 eligible subjects with diabetic foot ulcers were selected and subjects were randomly allocated into two groups Group A and Group B with 30 subjects in each group. Subjects in Group A underwent dressing with papain urea based preparation and in Group B underwent regular conventional dressing. Results were assessed with respect to percentage decrease in necrotic tissue, incidence of infection, appearance of granulation and hospital stay.Results: Among Group A subjects percentage reduction of necrotic tissue was more, granulation appeared early and the hospital stay was less compared to Group B subjects which were statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference with respect to incidence of infection in both groups.Conclusions: Papain urea based preparation is effective in diabetic foot ulcer care.