GM-CSF blockade with mavrilimumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation: a single-centre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 2020; 2: e465-73. 2 Dawson NV, Weiss R. Dichotomizing continuous variables in statistical analysis: a practice to avoid. Med Decis Making 2012; 32: 225-26.estimates were adjusted for postbaseline use of glucocorticoids. It should also be noted that the optimal time for tocilizumab use in the clinical course of COVID-19 remains to be elucidated.We declare no competing interests.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating central nervous system illness encountered in the setting of immunosuppressive conditions like human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, autoimmune diseases and hematologic malignancies. We had a 54-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus and coexisting autoimmune hepatitis who presented with progressive cognitive decline, right hemiparesis and ataxia who was found to have PML. She had severe CD4 lymphopenia. She was managed with low-dose prednisolone and plasma exchange after which she showed significant clinical improvement. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges encountered in managing a case of PML in the setting of autoimmune conditions with profound lymphopenia.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) had generated considerable interest for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prophylaxis. We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital in India, with dedicated COVID-19 care facilities. Objectives: Primary objective was incidence of adverse effects, secondary objective being efficacy in preventing COVID-19. Methods: Healthcare workers were recruited and grouped based on voluntary HCQ prophylaxis as per national guidelines. Side effects in HCQ group were graded in accordance with national cancer institute-common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. At 3–7-week follow-up, groups were compared for COVID-19 exposure, symptoms development and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RT-PCR results. Results: Among 358 participants recruited, 216 (60.3%) were males and mean age was 31.2 ± 6.6 years. Chemoprophylaxis was initiated by 258 (72%) participants. After loading dose, 7 (2.7%) reported grade 2 and 1 (0.4%) grade 3 adverse effects. Discontinuation of HCQ due to side effects was reported in 11 (4.3%) participants. Electrocardiogram was done by 50 (19.4%) participants on HCQ; no abnormalities were noted. A total of 106 (41%) among those taking and 63 (63%) among those not taking HCQ were tested for SARS-CoV-2 due to influenza-like illness or significant exposure. Among all participants, 25 (6.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3–9.6) developed COVID-19 during the study period. In the group taking HCQ, 10 (3.9%) tested positive compared to 15 (15%) in the group not taking HCQ (P < 0.001). Odds ratio with HCQ intake was 0.34 (95% CI 0.13–0.83, P = 0.01) and the number needed to treat was 12. Conclusion: HCQ is safe at the recommended dose for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19.