With the ageing population and their complex healthcare needs, elderly patients with chronic medical conditions are expected to make up an increasing proportion of the workload of ED in the future. A systems approach and a disease and case management approach in collaboration with primary care providers are interventions recommended to stem this.

Background and Objectives: In our institution, we have an ongoing newborn thyroid screening (NBS) program since July 2001. In the initial 9 months, we used cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (CBTSH) cutoff of 20 mIU/L and thereafter the cutoff was increased to 25 mIU/L. Our objective was to evaluate whether a CBTSH cutoff of 25 mIU/L is sensitive and cost-effective in NBS of congenital hypothyroidism (CH). Materials and Methods: All in-born babies are screened and those with CBTSH ≥25 mIU/L are recalled for confirmatory TSH/T4/FT4 tests. CH is confirmed with elevated TSH and low T4/FT4. Those with CBTSH 20–24.99 mIU/L were recalled for confirmatory tests in initial period of our NBS and prospectively between January and August 2017. Statistical analysis was done to derive positive predictive value and sensitivity to diagnose CH for each CBTSH between 20 and 30 mIU/L. Results: A total of 164,163 neonates were screened from July 2001 to August 2017. Of the 2352 babies with CBTSH ≥25–30 mIU/L, 1763 returned for retesting and 5 confirmed as CH (4 gland-in-situ and 1 absent uptake on nuclear scan). Of the 14,742 screened during the study period, 195 of the 293 babies with CBTSH 20–24.99 mIU/L returned for retesting and none diagnosed as CH. A CBTSH of 25 mIU/L has 99.2% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity. A lower screen TSH cutoff 20 mIU/L would result in recall of additional 300 babies/year with no definite improvement in sensitivity. Conclusions: Our data justify the continuation of using screen TSH cutoff of 25 mIU/L while using cord blood for NBS in our population. With a diverse and large population, it is important that we use feasible regional screen cutoffs for optimal use of our resources.

Aim and Objectives: 1. To study the clinical outcome, growth and glycaemic control, 2. To study the frequency and type of genetic mutations. Methods: This is a retrospective study with a review of data of medical records from 2008 till date. Results: Twelve patients (six males) with neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) were identified. Median (interquartile range – (IQR)) age at diagnosis was 72 (31–95) days with a history of consanguinity in 75%. The median birth weight (range) was 2345 (900–3300) g. Follow-up data were available for eight patients with a median age at (IQR) follow-up of 3.3 (3–5.3) years. At follow-up, the mean annual HbA1c was 8.2% at a mean insulin dose of 1.1 U/kg/d. One patient with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS) and 21α-hydroxylase deficiency had poor growth and intellectual difficulty. The rest demonstrated satisfactory growth with an increase of mean weight centile from 2 nd to 13 th , height centile from 6.5 th to 20 th and normal neuro-cognitive development. Eleven patients underwent genetic testing with a molecular diagnosis in 54% (6/11): EIF2AK3 ( n = 2) and one each in INS , PDX1 , IL2RA and FOXP3 . None had variants in ABCC8 or KCNJ11 . One with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome underwent haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and later succumbed. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates good clinical outcomes among NDM patients without immune dysfunction. Molecular diagnosis was attained only in around half of the patients (54%) with a great genetic heterogeneity.