SUMMARYObjective: The current study assessed the efficacy of three current bleaching methods.Methods: Seventy-five healthy subjects (45♀; 30♂) with anterior teeth, having a Vita Shade score of A2 or darker, participated in the study. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group A: home-bleaching (Illumine Home, 10% carbamide peroxide, trays, overnight, for two weeks), Group B: inoffice bleaching (Illumine Office, 15% hydrogen peroxide, trays for 45 minutes, three times over three weeks), Group C: Whitestrips (strips, twice a day, 30 minutes each for two weeks).Following the screening visit, three weeks prior to the baseline examination, all subjects received a dental prophylaxis. Clinical RelevanceThe efficacy of vital bleaching depends on the two aspects-viz, bleaching agent and the bleaching method. Results from this in vivo study show that 10% carbamide peroxide home-bleaching and 15% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching were more effective than a 6% hydrogen peroxide home-bleaching over-the-counter product up to three months after completion of the bleaching treatment. M Bizhang • Y-HP Chun • K Damerau P Singh • WH-M Raab • S ZimmerThe color of the teeth was determined using a colorimeter (ShadeEye NCC) and a custom-made stent at baseline (E 0 ), immediately after completion of the bleaching (E 3 ) and three months after treatment (E 4 ). All subjects received oral hygiene instructions and a toothbrush and toothpaste for oral home care during the study period.The change of tooth color was determined for each treatment regimen between baseline and E 3 and baseline and E 4 and was statistically analyzed performing the Kruskal Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney-U test. The significance level was set at p<0.01.Results: The dropout rate was 0%. Mean (SD) ∆E* (overall color change) from baseline to immediately after treatment was 6.57 (2.13) for Group A, 5.77(1.72) for Group B and 3.58 (1.57) for Group C. The mean (SD) tooth color change from baseline to three months after treatment ∆E* was: 4.98(1.34) for Group A, 4.59 (1.42) for Group B and 2.99 (1.39) for Group C. Significant differences were found between home bleaching and Whitestrips, as well as between in-office bleaching and Whitestrips, but not between homebleaching and in-office bleaching during the same time.Conclusion: Using an objective color measurement device, home bleaching and in-office bleaching were found to be superior to Whitestrips. Home bleaching and in-office bleaching were equally efficient for bleaching teeth and maintaining the results for up to three months.
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to provide insight into the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on breast cancer screening, breast surgery, and genetics consultations. METHODS: User data from a risk assessment company were collected from February 2 to April 11, 2020. The use of risk assessment was used as a proxy for the use of 3 breast cancer services, namely, breast imaging, breast surgery, and genetics consultation. Changes in the use of these services during the study period were analyzed. RESULTS: All 3 services experienced significant declines after the COVID-19 outbreak. The decline in breast surgery began during the week of March 8, followed by breast imaging and genetics consultation (both of which began during the week of March 15). Breast imaging experienced the most significant reduction, with an average weekly decline of 61.7% and a maximum decline of 94.6%. Breast surgery demonstrated an average weekly decline of 20.5%. When surgical consultation was stratified as breast cancer versus no breast cancer, the decrease among in non-breast cancer patients was more significant than that of patients with breast cancer (a decline of 66.8% vs 11.5% from the pre-COVID average weekly volume for non-breast cancer patients and patients with breast cancer, respectively). During the week of April 5, use of genetics consultations dropped to 39.9% of the average weekly volumes before COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the number of patients undergoing breast cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Cancer 2020;126:4466-4472.
We studied 13 patients with valvular vegetations who underwent intraoperative live/real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) and real time two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2DTEE). The 3DTEE provided incremental value on top of 2DTEE in its ability to accurately identify and localize vegetations and in identifying complications of infective endocarditis such as abscesses, perforations, and ruptured chordae. By using 3DTEE, we were able to measure vegetation volumes, perforation areas, and estimate the area of the valve that is involved in the infective process. These preliminary results suggest the superiority of 3DTEE over 2DTEE in the evaluation of valvular vegetations and provide incremental knowledge that is useful to the cardiac surgeons.
This case series demonstrates the incremental value of three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE) over two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D TTE) in the assessment of 11 patients with right ventricular (RV) masses or mass-like lesions (three cases of RV thrombus, one myxoma, one fibroma, one lipoma, one chordoma, and one sarcoma and three cases of RV noncompaction, which are considered to be mass-like in nature). 3D TTE was of incremental value in the assessment of these masses in that 3D TTE has the capacity to section the mass and view it from multiple angles, giving the examiner a more comprehensive assessment of the mass. This was particularly helpful in the cases of thrombi, as the presence of echolucencies indicated clot lysis. In addition, certainty in the number of thrombi present was an advantage of 3D TTE. Also, sectioning of cardiac tumors allowed more confidence in narrowing the differential diagnosis of the etiology of the mass. In addition, 3D TTE allowed us to identify precise location of the attachments of the masses as well as to determine whether there were mobile components to the mass. Another noteworthy advantage of 3D TTE was that the volumes of the masses could be calculated. Additionally, the findings by 3D TTE correlated well with pathologic examination of RV tumors, and some of the masses measured larger by 3D TTE than by 2D TTE, which was also validated in one case by surgery. As in the case of RV fibroma, another advantage was that 3D TTE actually identified more masses than 2D TTE. RV noncompaction was also well studied, and the assessment with 3D TTE helped to give a more definitive diagnosis in these patients.
We studied 31 patients with prosthetic valves (PVs) using two-dimensional and three-dimensional transthorathic echocardiography (2DTTE and 3DTTE, respectively) in order to determine whether 3DTTE provides an incremental value on top of 2DTTE in the evaluation of these patients. With 3DTTE both leaflets of the St. Jude mechanical PV can be visualized simultaneously, thereby increasing the diagnostic confidence in excluding valvular abnormalities and overcoming the well-known limitations of 2DTTE in the examination of PVs, which heavily relies on Doppler. Three-dimensional transthorathic echocardiography provides a more comprehensive evaluation of PV regurgitation than 2DTTE with its ability to more precisely quantify PV regurgitation, in determining the mechanism causing regurgitation, and in localizing the regurgitant defect. Furthermore, 3DTTE is superior in identifying, quantifying, and localizing PV thrombi and vegetations, in addition to the unique feature of providing a look inside mass lesions by serial sectioning. These preliminary results suggest the superiority of 3DTTE over 2DTTE in the evaluation of PVs and that it provides incremental knowledge to the echocardiographer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.