No abstract

No abstract

Introduction:Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart diseases are increasing in India. There is a clear need to study risk factors for NCDs in various population groups in the country.Materials and Methods:This community based cross-sectional survey was conducted to study the diet and physical activity of women in urban and rural areas in Vellore district. Dietary data was collected using 24-h dietary recall and physical activity was collected using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Sociodemographic variables were collected to assess the risk factors for unfavorable diet and physical activity.Results:The odds of the rural women engaging in high physical activity are 3.61 times greater than urban women (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.36−5.54). The odds of the urban women consuming a high calorie diet are 1.923 times that of the rural women (95% CI = 1.282−2.857). The odds of the urban women being overweight/obese are 5.555 times than that of the urban women (95% CI = 3.333−10). Women who were housewives and not doing household work were significantly less physically active, took higher calorie diet, and were more overweight and obese compared to women who were involved in active household work.Conclusions:Urban women had unfavorable diet and physical activity levels compared to rural women. They also had higher levels of overweight and obesity. There is a need for targeted NCD prevention interventions among urban women.

Objectives: Primary objective – Phase I: The primary objective of this study was as follows: (1) To identify common protective resilient factors that enabled the adult female cancer survivors to cope with the cancer experience. (2) To identify potential barriers to the resilience of adult female cancer survivors. Secondary objective – Phase II: The secondary objective of this study was to develop and validate a resilience tool for cancer survivorship. Material and Methods: A mixed approach using sequential exploratory design was used in the study. A qualitative approach using phenomenology design was used in the first phase followed by a quantitative approach in the second phase. In the first phase, in-depth interviews were conducted until data saturation with 14 female breast cancer survivors chosen by purposive and maximum variation sampling methods based on inclusion criteria. The researcher used Colaizzi’s data analysis framework to analyse the transcripts. Findings were configured as protective resilience factors and barriers to resilience. Based on the analysis of the qualitative phase, the researcher developed a 35-item resilience tool for cancer survivorship. Content validity, criterion validity and reliability of the newly developed instrument were assessed. Results: In the qualitative phase, the mean age of the participants was 57.07 years and the mean age at diagnosis was 55.5 years. The majority 11 (78.57%) of them were homemakers. All 14 (100%) of them had undergone surgery. The majority 11 (78.57%) of them had all three modes of therapy, that is, surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The categories of themes identified are presented under two main headings, that is, protective resilience factors and barriers to resilience. The theme categories identified under protective resilience factors were personal, social, spiritual, physical, economic and psychological factors. The barriers to resilience identified were lack of awareness, medical/biological barriers, social, financial and psychological barriers. The developed resilience tool had a content validity index of 0.98, a criterion validity of 0.67, internal consistency of 0.88 and stability of 0.99 at a 95% confidence interval. Principle component analysis (PCA) was used to validate the domains. PCA of protective resilience factors (Q1–Q23) and barriers to resilience (Q24–Q35) had Eigenvalues of 7.65 and 4.49, respectively. The resilience tool for cancer survivorship was found to have good construct validity. Conclusion: The present study has identified the protective resilience factors and barriers to resilience among adult female cancer survivors. The developed resilience tool for cancer survivorship was found to have good validity and reliability. It will be useful for nurses and all other healthcare professionals to assess the resilience needs of cancer survivors and to provide need-based quality cancer care

Introduction The objective of the study was to achieve continuous improvement in Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) management through performance measurements using user satisfaction surveys and interventions. Methods A brainstorming session was conducted with the multidisciplinary process improvement team in 2012 on the reasons for dissatisfaction with CSSD services. A baseline survey questionnaire was prepared to assess levels of dissatisfaction for key indicators and to establish target benchmarks for improvement. Charge nurses in the wards were chosen as respondents. The report was presented by the Quality Management Cell (QMC) to the steering committee in the presence of the CSSD managers. Solutions and support were offered to the team for improvement. Similar surveys were conducted in 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 to understand the impact of the changes implemented. Results The overall satisfaction of the respondents with the CSSD services increased from 54% in 2012 to 89% in 2019, which is statistically significant (95% Cl: −0.56 to −0.25) with p-value < 0.001. Conclusion This exercise helped to build a strong team and create a culture of openness in the CSSD. Improvement measures were data driven and other departments like Radiology and Laundry were motivated to embrace the idea of understanding their user perceptions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of internal user satisfaction surveys as a valuable tool for continuous quality improvement. This exercise proved beyond doubt that regular monitoring improves quality of services.