No abstract

Over the last few decades Cry1Ac toxin has been widely used in controlling the insect attack due to its high specificity towards target insects. The pore-forming toxin undergoes a complex mechanism in the insect midgut involving sequential interaction with specific glycosylated receptors in which terminal GalNAc molecule plays a vital role. Recent studies on Cry toxins interactions with specific receptors revealed the importance of several amino acid residues in domain III of Cry1Ac, namely Q509, N510, R511, Y513 and W545, serve as potential binding sites that surround the putative GalNAc binding pocket and mediate the toxin-receptor interaction. In the present study, alanine substitution mutations were generated in the Cry1Ac domain III region and functional significance of those key residues was monitored by insect bioassay on Helicoverpa armigera larvae. In addition, ligand blot analysis and SPR binding assay was performed to monitor the binding characteristics of Cry1Ac wild type and mutant toxins towards HaALP receptor isolated from Helicoverpa armigera. Mutagenesis data revealed that, alanine substitutions in R511, Y513 and W545 substantially impacted the relative affinity towards HaALP receptor and toxicity toward target insect. Furthermore, in silico study of GalNAc-mediated interaction also confirmed the important roles of these residues. This structural analysis will provide a detail insight for evaluating and engineering new generation Cry toxins to address the problem of change in insect behavioral patterns.

Bcl-xl protein has a long unstructured loop attached to its structured region which joins two helices. The necessity to have this unstructured segment in Bcl-xl is not yet well understood. To what extent the unstructured segment can influence the dynamics of the structured region of protein, with potential to influence the function, has been investigated in this work. Molecular dynamics simulation and principal component analysis show how the loop affects the internal motions of the protein, particularly its ligand binding pocket. Generally an unstructured region in the structure would promote flexibility resulting entropic stability but in contrary, here it narrows down the conformational space of the structured region of protein that could be hypothesized to impact the functional precision. Effects of the loop propagate to the binding pocket through structural rearrangements of polar side chains. The immediate suspicion of possible impact of phosphorylation to modulate the function of the protein is proven to be a fact, as the phosphorylated S49 and S62 located on the large unstructured region are seen to perturb the electrostatic network of the structure; an observation that validates and clarifies the role of loop as a modulator through biophysical and biochemical mechanisms. Proteins 2017; 85:1567-1579. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

No abstract

The basic framework of understanding the mechanisms of protein functions is achieved from the knowledge of their structures which can model the molecular recognition. Recent advancement in the structural biology has revealed that in spite of the availability of the structural data, it is nontrivial to predict the mechanism of the molecular recognition which progresses via situation-dependent structural adaptation. The mutual selectivity of protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions often depends on the modulations of conformations empowered by their inherent flexibility, which in turn regulates the function. The mechanism of a protein's function, which used to be explained by the ideas of 'lock and key' has evolved today as the concept of 'induced fit' as well as the 'population shift' models. It is felt that the 'dynamics' is an essential feature to take into account for understanding the mechanism of protein's function. The design principles of therapeutic molecules suffer from the problems of plasticity of the receptors whose binding conformations are accurately not predictable from the prior knowledge of a template structure. On the other hand, flexibility of the receptors provides the opportunity to improve the binding affinity of a ligand by suitable substitution that will maximize the binding by modulating the receptors surface. In this paper, we discuss with example how the protein's flexibility is correlated with its functions in various systems, revealing the importance of its understanding and for making applications. We also highlight the methodological challenges to investigate it computationally and to account for the flexible nature of the molecules in drug design.