Home-based testing is an alternative, convenient and cost-effective method of testing for sexually transmitted infections compared to traditional clinic-based testing, in patients who are asymptomatic and, or, would otherwise feel stigmatised about attending sexual health clinics. The sexual health service in Birmingham and Solihull, called Umbrella, provides an online home-based testing service, which has been in operation since August 2015. The aim of this study was to evaluate the uptake and return rate of home-based testing kits and compare home-based testing to clinic-based testing in terms of diagnosis and treatment rates of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC). Our study showed that home-based testing is a popular method of testing and relatively more popular amongst asymptomatic, young, heterosexual female and White patients than clinic-based testing, with a return rate of 48%. The diagnosis rates for CT/GC are comparable to patients who attend clinic for testing (8% vs. 10% in home-based and clinic-based groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The overall treatment rate was lower in the home-based compared to the clinic-based group (82% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). Umbrella will continue to provide this service within Birmingham and Solihull and aim to provide patients with alternative pathways for more convenient access to treatment.
The sexual health services in the Birmingham and Solihull area of the United Kingdom, called Umbrella, has been offering home-based testing for sexually transmitted infections to patients since August 2015. The aim of this service evaluation was to evaluate the uptake, return rate and new diagnosis rates of home-based testing in comparison with clinic-based testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis (STS) and hepatitis B. Home-based testing, although popular, had low uptake amongst high-risk groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM), compared to the clinic-based group (1% versus 11%, p < 0.001). This resulted in low positivity rates for HIV (0.02%) and STS (0.17%) and no new cases of hepatitis B in the home-based group. Therefore, our results show that home-based testing is not a cost-effective method of testing for HIV and likely this is also the case for hepatitis B and STS. Our recommendation would be to encourage uptake of home-based testing in high-risk groups such as MSM and Black Africans to improve the diagnosis rates of HIV, STS and hepatitis B. Alternatively, the continuation of home-based blood testing in the Birmingham and Solihull area will need to be reviewed by Umbrella as a cost-saving strategy for the service in the future.
IntroductionPublic Health England recommends that local authorities should work towards making STI testing more accessible. Since August 2015, sexual health services in Birmingham and Solihull area (Umbrella) have provided online home-based testing.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinic and online database to identify patients who undertook home-based and clinic-based testing in the Birmingham and Solihull clinics between January and June 2016.ResultsAbstract O15 Table 1Home based v clinic based testingHome-based testing (n=9258)Clinic-based testing (n=19193)P valueAge16–24 >256033 (65%)3225 (35%)9654 (50%)9539 (50%)<0.001Gender Female Male Transgender5986 (65%)3258 (35%)14 (0%)10861 (57%)8306 (43%)26 (0%)<0.001Ethnicity White Black/British Black Asian/British Asian Other: Not specified:6648 (72%)892 (10%)558 (6%)920 (10%)240 (3%)7996(42%)4026 (21%)2167(11%)2160 (11%)2844 (15%)<0.001Asymptomatic7408/9258 (80%)9729/19193 (51%)<0.001Return rate4476 (48%)–Prevalence rates382/4476 (9%)2141/19193 (11%)<0.001Treatment rate174/382 (46%)1663/2141 (78%)<0.001DiscussionHome-based testing appears to be popular among asymptomatic, younger (16–24 years), white and female patients, with poor overall return rates. There may be a need for promotion of this method of testing among ethnic minorities. The current method of recall needs to be reviewed to improve treatment rates in the home-based testing group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.