The presence, severity and duration of early fluid are associated with increased ICU mortality in children admitted to the pediatric ICU in shock states.

Objective: A standardised multi-site approach to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax does not exist and leads to unnecessary practice variation. The Chylothorax Work Group utilised the Pediatric Critical Care Consortium infrastructure to address this gap. Methods: Over 60 multi-disciplinary providers representing 22 centres convened virtually as a quality initiative to develop an algorithm to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax. Agreement was objectively quantified for each recommendation in the algorithm by utilising an anonymous survey. “Consensus” was defined as ≥ 80% of responses as “agree” or “strongly agree” to a recommendation. In order to determine if the algorithm recommendations would be correctly interpreted in the clinical environment, we developed ex vivo simulations and surveyed patients who developed the algorithm and patients who did not. Results: The algorithm is intended for all children (<18 years of age) within 30 days of cardiac surgery. It contains rationale for 11 central chylothorax management recommendations; diagnostic criteria and evaluation, trial of fat-modified diet, stratification by volume of daily output, timing of first-line medical therapy for “low” and “high” volume patients, and timing and duration of fat-modified diet. All recommendations achieved “consensus” (agreement >80%) by the workgroup (range 81–100%). Ex vivo simulations demonstrated good understanding by developers (range 94–100%) and non-developers (73%–100%). Conclusions: The quality improvement effort represents the first multi-site algorithm for the management of paediatric post-operative chylothorax. The algorithm includes transparent and objective measures of agreement and understanding. Agreement to the algorithm recommendations was >80%, and overall understanding was 94%.

Introduction: The American Heart Association (AHA) and other national institutions have endorsed modifications to resuscitation guidelines given the risk of healthcare workers’ (HCWs) exposure to COVID-19. Institutional implementation of the COVID-19-focused guidelines requires both proof of feasibility and education of HCW. Pediatric critical care medical directors at The University of Texas Southwestern/Children’s Health System of Texas (UTSW/CHST) created a guideline for the resuscitation of COVID-19 patients. The simulation team used in situ simulation to demonstrate guideline feasibility and to create educational materials. Methods: A UTSW/CHST guideline incorporated COVID-19-focused AHA and other national organizational recommendations to fit the institutional needs. A high-fidelity in situ simulation helped test the feasibility and optimize the UTSW/CHST guideline. We developed a novel form of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP), expert-driven RCDP, in which all simulation participants are experts, to debrief the simulation. Results: In situ simulation with expert-driven RCDP demonstrated guideline feasibility in the resuscitation of a COVID-19 patient while balancing the protection of HCW. Expert-driven RCDP allowed for real-time alterations to the guideline during the simulation event. Video recording and dissemination of the simulation allowed for the education of over 300 staff on the new recommendations. Conclusions: High-fidelity in situ simulation with expert-driven RCDP created a rapid consensus among expert critical care providers to develop the UTSW/CHST guideline and quickly adopt the new AHA recommendations. This debriefing method helped minimize the risk of HCW exposure by minimizing the number of required participants and time for simulation. We recommend using this distinctive, expert-driven RCDP debriefing method for expeditious testing of COVID-19-focused processes at other institutions. Video Abstract available at: [link forthcoming]