Background: The implementation of electronic health record (EHR) software at healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited by financial and technological constraints. Smile Train, the world’s largest cleft charity, developed a cleft treatment EHR system, Smile Train Express (STX), and distributed it to their partnered institutions. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in medical documentation practices amongst Smile Train-partner institutions to characterize the impact that specialized EHR software has on medical documentation practices at healthcare facilities in LMICs. Methods: Surveys were administered electronically to 843 Smile Train-partnered institutions across 68 LMICs. The survey inquired about institutions’ internet connection, documentation methods used during patient encounters, rationale for using said methods, and documentation methods for cloud-based storage of healthcare data. Institutions were grouped by economic and geographic subgroups for analysis. Results: A total of 162 institutions (19.2%) responded to the survey. Most institutions employed paper charting (64.2%) or institutional EHR software (25.9%) for data entry during a patient encounter with the latter’s use varying significantly across geographical subgroups ( P = 0.01). STX was used by 18 institutions (11.1%) during a patient encounter. Workflow was the most frequently cited reason for institutions to employ their entry method during a patient encounter (51.4%). Conclusions: The provision of STX to partnered institutions influenced medical documentation practices at several institutions; however, regulations and guidelines have likely limited its complete integration into clinical workflows. Further studies are needed to characterize trends in medical documentation in LMICs at a more granular level.

BackgroundThe reliable availability of health technologies, defined as equipment, medicines, and consumable supplies, is essential to ensure successful childbirth practices proven to prevent avoidable maternal and newborn mortality. The majority of global maternal and newborn deaths take place in Africa and Asia, yet few data exist that describe the availability of childbirth-related health technologies in these regions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health workers in Africa and Asia in order to profile the availability of health technologies considered to be essential to providing safe childbirth care.MethodsHealth workers in Africa and Asia were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire. A list of essential childbirth-related health technologies was drawn from World Health Organization guidelines for preventing and managing complications associated with the major causes of maternal and newborn mortality globally. Demographic data describing each birth center were obtained and health workers reported on the availability of essential childbirth-related health technologies at their centers. Comparison analyses were conducted using Rao-Scott chi-square test statistics.ResultsHealth workers from 124 birth centers in 26 African and 15 Asian countries participated. All facilities exhibited gaps in the availability of essential childbirth-related health technologies. Availability was significantly reduced in birth centers that had lower birth volumes and those from lower income countries. On average across all centers, health workers reported the availability of 18 of 23 essential childbirth-related health technologies (79%; 95% CI, 74%, 84%). Low-volume facilities suffered severe shortages; on average, these centers reported reliable availability of 13 of 23 technologies (55%; 95% CI, 39%, 71%).ConclusionsSubstantial gaps exist in the availability of essential childbirth-related health technologies across health sector levels in Africa and Asia. Strategies that facilitate reliable access to vital health technologies in these regions are an urgent priority.

No abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted health systems worldwide, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many countries limited the delivery of elective surgery. To date, COVID-19’s impact on elective surgery in LMICs has been unquantified. We use operative data from a large international non-government cleft organization to compare case volume for 2019 and 2020 to quantify the impact of COVID-19. Methods: Smile Train supports a partner network of over 1100 partners globally to deliver treatment to children with cleft lip and cleft palate (CLP). Treatment data is documented into a proprietary digital platform, Smile Train Express. We compared monthly treatment data for 2019 to 2020, by country, and by World Bank Income group to describe the effect that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on CLP surgery in LMICs. Results: Our analysis shows 25,444 (31.4%) fewer primary operations performed between January and December 2020 than in the same period in 2019 with the most significant decline in procedures observed in April 2020. Many countries resumed elective surgery for CLP procedures from May onward and volume approximated that of pre-pandemic baseline by November of 2020. Conclusions: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic had a large impact on health systems and service delivery across the world. We find that this is evident in the delivery of CLP surgery in LMICs. The impact is characterized by a dramatic decrease in surgery rates in April of 2020 with a recovery of surgical volume from July 2020 onwards. The rate of surgical rate recovery is consistent across World Bank Income groups.