In this paper, selected episodes of the 2005 series of the BBC science fiction television show Doctor Who are used to discuss self/other identity formulations, in terms of how "we" relate to those considered different. I shall examine how Doctor Who represents threats and dangers and relate this to how we can use such understandings to learn, discuss, and critique conventional understandings of security in International Relations (IR). Popular culture texts such as Doctor Who provide examples of how difference is often conceptualized as a threat to be eliminated. At the same time, Doctor Who also gives space to question and critique these understandings of "others" as threats, especially in its illustrations of the location of threats, its shifting perspective, and its centralization of a nonhuman as its protagonist. As such, Doctor Who points toward theorizing world politics in which the self = good/others = threats dichotomy can be questioned and opens up new ways of engaging with those considered different.

No abstract

No abstract

In their recent article "We're all terrorists now: critical or hypocritical studies on terrorism?" David Martin Jones and M. L. R. Smith strongly criticize Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS) for a series of reasons, including a lack of evidence for CTS claims, an over-focus on deconstruction and emancipation combined with an under focus on explanation, and an ethically dubious relativism.In this response, we agree with many of Jones and Smith's criticisms. However, where Jones and Smith see these criticisms as undermining CTS, we interpret the concerns very differently. Instead of indicating unfixable problems, we note these issues as presenting opportunities for CTS to further develop a methodologically rigorous empirical research program.We draw on Jones and Smith's criticisms of CTS to point toward five areas of development for terrorism studies in general and CTS in particular.

No abstract