Methods of treating obesity, such as changes in lifestyle, physical activity, restrictive diets, and psychotherapy, are not sufficient. Currently, it is considered that in the case of patients who meet the eligibility criteria for surgery, the treatment of choice should be bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the weight loss and metabolic changes in a group of adults with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. The study involved 163 patients whose body mass index (BMI) exceeded 40 or 35 kg/m2, concurrent with at least one metabolic sequelae. In 120 of the cases (74%), sleeve gastrectomy was used; in 35 (21%), gastric bypass was used; and in 8 (5%), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass was used. Metabolic parameters such as total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), HDL-cholesterol (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), triglycerides, and glucose were measured preoperatively and postoperatively, as well as the creatinine, creatine kinase (CK-MB), and leptin activity. In patients undergoing bariatric surgery, a significant decrease in excess weight (p < 0.001) was observed at all the analyzed time points, compared to the pre-surgery value. Weight loss after surgery was associated with a significant improvement in glycemia (109.6 ± 48.0 vs. 86.6 ± 7.9 mg/dL >24 months after surgery; p = 0.003), triglycerides (156.9 ± 79.6 vs. 112.7 ± 44.3 mg/dL >24 months after surgery; p = 0.043) and leptin (197.50 ± 257.3 vs. 75.98 ± 117.7 pg/mL 12 months after surgery; p = 0.0116) concentration. The results of the research confirm the thesis on the effectiveness of bariatric surgery in reducing excess body weight and improving metabolic parameters in patients with extreme obesity.

Introduction: The incidence of obesity is increasing in developed societies, and surgical treatment is one treatment option. The most common surgical treatment for obesity is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complication of both obesity and the surgical treatment of obesity. Materials and methods: In this study, the PubMed database was searched using the keywords “GERD” and “bariatric surgery”, and 987 papers published between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022 were retrieved. Results: Nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The articles were analyzed for the de novo occurrence of GERD after the treatment of its symptoms, the occurrence of erosive esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus. In addition, interesting conclusions are presented from the papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria but shed light on the pathophysiology of GERD in obese patients undergoing LSG. Conclusion: In conclusion, the authors draw attention to the need for endoscopic surveillance in patients undergoing LSG, even in the absence of clinical signs of GERD.

Background: Surgical treatment is the most effective method of treatment for obesity; and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed bariatric surgery. Objective: The aim of the study was evaluation of the frequency of occurrence and the degree of progression of changes characteristic of GERD in patients who had undergone LSG in clinical; endoscopic; and microscopic images in the obtained bioptats; and an attempt to correlate the results obtained with the effectiveness of bariatric treatment. Materials and Method: The anonymized clinical data concerning 214 patients who had undergone LSG were collected from the database. Invitations for check-up examinations were distributed, to which 37 patients responded. Two patients were excluded from the study. In 35 patients after LSG check-up clinical examination, bariatric endoscopy (BE) and bariatric microscopy (BM) were performed on bioptats collected from the site of the gastro-esophageal junction; and 3 specimens collected at 2 cm intervals from the Z-line. The study was performed according to the standard protocol. Results: In the analyzed group, clinical symptoms of GERD occurred in 12 patients (34.5%), including 10 females and 2 males. The symptom reported by all patients was retrosternal pain/burning (heartburn). In BE, foci of ectopic mucosa in the epicardial part of the esophagus were found in 16 patients (14 F and 2 M). No correlation was observed between the analyzed parameters and the occurrence of the above-mentioned changes. In BM, only in three patients were the changes described as normal esophageal mucosa; while in another three, as foci of intestinal metaplasia, Barrett’s esophagus. In this group no foci of dysplasia were found. In eight patients, the changes were described as inflammatory. In ten patients from this group, microscopic changes occurred without clinical symptoms of the disease. Conclusions: GERD is an important clinical problem in patients after LSG; therefore; the problem of occurrence or exacerbation of symptoms of the disease should be discussed with the patient during qualification for bariatric surgery. The bariatric effectiveness of LSG does not correlate with the occurrence of the symptoms of GERD after the procedure. However; the lack of clinical symptoms of the disease does not mean the lack of its occurrence. Therefore; the endoscopic check-up after LSG should be routinely performed. During the qualification for LSG screening, histopathologic examinations of the esophagus may be useful for the assessment of the microscopic symptoms of GERD in oligosymptomatic patients; and exclusion of rare pathologies of the esophagus (e.g., eosinophilic esophagitis), which may complicate post-operative course.

Cholecystolithiasis is among the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders requiring surgical intervention, and iatrogenic damage to the bile tree is a severe complication. We aimed to present the frequency of bile duct injuries and how our facility handles these complications. We retrospectively analyzed bile duct injuries in patients undergoing surgery. We concentrated on factors such as sex, age, indications for surgery, type of surgery, primary procedure, bile tree injury, repair, and timing as well as early and late complications. There were 22 cases of bile duct injury in the studied material, primarily affecting women—15 individuals (68.2%). Eleven cases (45.7%) of acute cholecystitis were the primary reason for surgery, and an injury to the common bile duct that extended up to 2 cm from the common hepatic duct was the most common complication (European Association for Endoscopic Surgery grade 2). Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was the most common repair procedure in 14 cases (63.6%). Eleven patients (50%) experienced early complications following reconstruction surgery, whereas five patients (22.7%) experienced late complications. An annual mortality rate of 22.7% (five patients) was observed. Iatrogenic bile duct injury is a severe complication of surgical treatment for cholecystolithiasis. Reconstruction procedures are characterized by high complication rates and high mortality.

Colonoscopy is a routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Along with the increase in the complexity of the procedures performed, the risk of complications increases. In 2017, WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) published the principles of safe colonoscopy. Intestinal perforation is one of the most common complications. The risk of perforation in treatment procedures such as mucosectomy or endoscopic dissection is significantly greater than the risk of diagnostic colonoscopy. The basic rule of procedure in case of suspected perforation is close supervision over the patient's condition and as soon as possible repair of damage. The role of the endoscopist is not only to recognize, but also to treat the damage early. Immediate endoscopic treatment of lesions is an effective, final and acceptable management strategy. In patients who have undergone imaging diagnostics for another reason free gas in the peritoneal cavity can be recognized. It does not have to mean the need for urgent surgical intervention. Patients with asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum after colonoscopy should, however, be treated as patients with suspected perforation of the large intestine and undergo careful clinical observation in accordance with WSES recommendations. Colonoscopy is a procedure with a risk of complications, which should be reported to patients qualified for endoscopy, but appropriate management reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure.