BackgroundInterpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) is not only one of the most important parts of diagnostics but also one of the most difficult areas to teach. Owing to the abstract nature of the basic theoretical knowledge of the ECG, its scattered characteristics, and tedious and difficult-to-remember subject matter, teaching how to interpret ECGs is as difficult for teachers to teach as it is for students to learn. In order to enable medical students to master basic knowledge of ECG interpretation skills in a limited teaching time, we modified the content used for traditional ECG teaching and now propose a new ECG teaching method called the “graphics-sequence memory method.”MethodsA prospective randomized controlled study was designed to measure the actual effectiveness of ECG learning by students. Two hundred students were randomly placed under a traditional teaching group and an innovative teaching group, with 100 participants in each group. The teachers in the traditional teaching group utilized the traditional teaching outline, whereas the teachers in the innovative teaching group received training in line with the proposed teaching method and syllabus. All the students took an examination in the final semester by analyzing 20 ECGs from real clinical cases and submitted their ECG reports.ResultsThe average ECG reading time was 32 minutes for the traditional teaching group and 18 minutes for the innovative teaching group. The average ECG accuracy results were 43% for the traditional teaching group and 77% for the innovative teaching group.ConclusionLearning to accurately interpret ECGs is an important skill in the cardiac discipline, but the ECG’s mechanisms are intricate and the content is scattered. Textbooks tend to make the students feel confused owing to the restrictions of the length and the format of the syllabi, apart from many other limitations. The graphics-sequence memory method was found to be a useful method for ECG teaching.

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) genes are frequently altered in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of CDKN2A/B deletions in ALL patients. Methods: Systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases up to July 2018. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed-effects or random-effects models. Results: A total of thirteen studies including 2857 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Combined HRs suggested that CDKN2A/B deletions were poor prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) (HR ¼ 2.15, 95% CI 1.82-2.54) and event-free survival (EFS)/disease-free survival (DFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR ¼ 2.16, 95% CI 1.73-2.69). The adverse impact remained significant in both adult and paediatric ALL patients, and also in subgroups by ethnicity, ALL type, detection method of CDKN2A/B deletions, statistical method and endpoint. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that CDKN2A/B deletions were associated with poor prognosis independently in both adult and childhood ALL patients. Inclusion of CDKN2A/B status may further improve the risk stratification of ALL patients. KEY MESSAGESAlthough numerous studies have explored the prognostic significance of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients, the results remain conflicting. In this meta-analysis, we found that CDKN2A/B deletions were independent poor prognostic markers for both adult and paediatric ALL patients. Our findings justify the inclusion of CDKN2A/B status in the risk stratification of ALL patients.

The IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1) gene is frequently altered in adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although many studies have indicated that IKZF1 alterations might be associated with poor outcomes in adults with ALL, the results remain controversial. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated the negative prognostic significance of IKZF1 deletion in ALL. However, most of the included studies (14 out of 15) were conducted in pediatric patients with ALL, and age was identified as a significant source of heterogeneity. Thus, performing the present meta-analysis provides valuable information to further elucidate the prognostic value of IKZF1 deletion in adults with ALL. Eight studies were identified that had been published prior to August 1, 2016. The studies included a total of 1008 patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/event-free survival (EFS) were pooled to estimate the prognostic power of IKZF1 deletion. Pooled HRs suggested that IKZF1 deletion had a negative impact on both OS (HR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.13-1.73) and DFS/RFS/PFS/EFS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.17) in the overall population. Subgroup analyses indicated that IKZF1 deletion could independently predict unfavorable OS (HR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.25-2.06) and DFS/RFS/PFS/EFS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.17) in BCR-ABL1-negative but not in BCR-ABL1-positive B cell ALL patients. Our meta-analysis suggests that IKZF1 deletion is a poor prognostic factor for adults with B cell ALL and may be more valuable in BCR-ABL1-negative B cell ALL patients.

Previous studies highlight the need for a more active conditioning therapy in highrisk or refractory and relapsed lymphomas. Our preclinical research shows that histone deacetylase inhibitors, such as either vorinostat or chidamide, sensitize lymphoma cells to the cytotoxic combination of cladribine, gemcitabine and busulfan, leading to cell apoptosis. To evaluate the efficacy of this chidamide-cladribinegemcitabine-busulfan (ChiCGB) combination as a new conditioning therapy, we conducted a Phase II trial, as described here. Patients with high-risk, relapsed/refractory lymphomas received ChiCGB as conditioning therapy, after transplantation with autologous peripheral stem cells. The sample comprised 105 patients in total: 60 with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) and 45 with T-cell or natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NK/T). All patients eventually achieved full hematopoietic recovery. Neutrophils and platelets were engrafted at a median of 10 days (8-14) and 13 days (8-38), respectively. There was no transplant-related mortality within 100 days of transplant. Neutropenic fever, mucositis and atopic dermatitis were the observed nonhematologic toxicities. At a median follow-up of 35.4 months, 80.6% of the patients presented with no tumor progression, and the overall survival (OS) reached as high as 86.1%. Concerning the OS rate, 94.5% of patients with B-NHL and 75.4% of patients with T-cell or NK/T lymphomas survived. These findings demonstrate the safety and validity of the proposed combined therapy for high-risk and refractory/ relapsed lymphomas. Our study was registered on the Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03151876).

We report the clinical results of sustainedly integrating imatinib and interferon-α into maintenance therapy in the patients ineligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Maintenance therapy lasted for 5 years with imatinib 400 mg daily, interferon-α 3 million units, 2∼3 doses per week, and chemotherapy including vindesine and dexamethasone scheduled monthly in first year, once every 2 months in second year, and once every 3 months in third year. The chemotherapy was discontinued after 3 years and the imatinib and interferon-α continued for another 2 years. For 41 patients without allo-HSCT with a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year DFS and OS were 42.7  ± 8.6% and 57.9  ± 8.4%, respectively. Our study suggests that sustaining maintenance with low-dose chemotherapy, imatinib and interferon-α improved survival of adult Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) patients ineligible for allo-HSCT, and even provided an opportunity for cure. BCR/ABL persistent negativity at 6 and 9 months may have benefit to choose suitable patients for the imatinib/interferon-α maintenance strategy.