Background: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains one of the most important complications of transradial access (TRA). Despite the identification of multiple predictors, the interaction between these predictors on the occurrence of RAO has not been evaluated.Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TRA coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were retrospectively analyzed to compare the effect of standard patent hemostasis using a one-bladder band versus twobladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression and two introducer sizes on the primary endpoint of RAO. Access was obtained using 6-Fr slender introducer sheath or 7-Fr slender introducer sheath and hemostasis with either a one-bladder band or a two-bladder band. The radial artery was evaluated using ultrasound.Results: Total of 2019 patients undergoing CA or PCI were included in the analysis.In the one-bladder band group, the incidence of RAO with a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath was 4.2%. In those receiving hemostasis with a two-bladder band, RAO occurred in 1% of patients receiving a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath versus 0.9% in those receiving a 7-Fr slender introducer sheath (p = 0.68). Larger radial artery diameter, larger body weight, and a two-bladder hemostasis band with ipsilateral ulnar compression were independently associated with a lower incidence of RAO. Conclusion:A two-bladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression when used for radial artery hemostasis, is associated with a lower incidence of RAO, and can mitigate the penalty for a larger catheter with reassuring implications for use of a 7-Fr capable system for complex transradial PCI.

No abstract

Background Lack of health insurance is associated with adverse clinical outcomes; however, the association between health insurance status and in‐hospital outcomes after out‐of‐hospital ventricular fibrillation (OHVFA) arrest is unclear. Hypothesis Lack of health insurance is associated with worse in‐hospital outcomes after out‐of‐hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest. Methods From January 2003 to December 2014, hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of OHVFA in patients ≥18 years of age were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were categorized into insured and uninsured groups based on their documented health insurance status. Study outcome measures were in‐hospital mortality, utilization of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cost of hospitalization. Inverse probability weighting adjusted binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality and ICD utilization and linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cost of hospitalization. Results Of 188 946 patients included in the final analyses, 178 005 (94.2%) patients were insured and 10 941 (5.8%) patients were uninsured. Unadjusted in‐hospital mortality was higher (61.7% vs. 54.7%, p < .001) and ICD utilization was lower (15.3% vs. 18.3%, p < .001) in the uninsured patients. Lack of health insurance was independently associated with higher in‐hospital mortality (O.R = 1.53, 95% C.I. [1.46–1.61]; p < .001) and lower utilization of ICD (O.R = 0.84, 95% C.I [0.79–0.90], p < .001). Cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in uninsured patients (median [interquartile range], p‐value) ($) (39 650 [18 034‐93 399] vs. 35 965 [14 568.50‐96 163], p < .001). Conclusion Lack of health insurance is associated with higher in‐hospital mortality, lower utilization of ICD and higher cost of hospitalization after OHVFA.

No abstract

No abstract