No abstract

Summary:A questionnaire on the pattern of drug taking was completed by 185 patients with chronic airflow obstruction. Of these, 49% admitted to taking their prescribed therapy regularly and 33% could be regarded as being fully compliant. The use ofincreasing numbers ofdrugs was not accompanied by a fall in compliance. Regular drug taking was better in patients (particularly females) with asthma than in patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema. During acute exacerbations of airflow obstruction, excessive use of bronchodilators beyond the recommended increase in medication was rare; indeed, underuse of therapy in this situation was commoner. These conclusions must be regarded as tentative since the questionnaire was not validated by repeat interviewing or measurement of drug usage.

Nebulized normal saline is frequently prescribed for the treatment of bronchiolitis or bronchial asthma exacerbations. We aimed to reinforce guidelines care by educating providers on the futility of saline administration. Frequency and indications for nebulized normal saline prescription were documented from November 1, 2014, to April 1, 2015, and then again, after dissemination of educational material to providers, from November 1, 2016, to April 1, 2017. A total of 263 patients had bronchiolitis and 470 had asthma. Nebulized normal saline for bronchiolitis decreased significantly in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings ( P < .001 and P = .027, respectively). For asthma exacerbations, the use of nebulized normal saline decreased significantly in the inpatient setting ( P = .025), while in the ED, numbers were low at baseline and remained unchanged. Nebulized normal saline administration in the hospital setting results in continued use in the community, where this leads to unnecessary ED visits, where first-line therapy should have been administered.

No abstract

Forty-one children suspected of having tuberculosis were simultaneously given an intermediate strength Mantoux test, an old tuberculin tine test (OT), and a purified protein derivative (PPD) tine test. Each test was read at 48 hours, and the largest diameter of induration was recorded. Twenty-nine patients had a positive reaction to the Mantoux test, 20 patients had a positive reaction to the OT tine test, and 16 patients had a positive reaction to the PPD-tine test. There were seven instances of a doubtful reaction to the OT tine test and nine to the PPD-tine test. Two children with positive Mantoux tests had negative OT tine tests, and four with positive Mantoux tests had negative PPD-tine test reactions. There was a significant difference between the number of positive reactors to the Mantoux test and both tine tests. If all tine test reactions of 2 mm or more were considered positive (doubtful plus positive reactors), there was no significant difference between any of the tuberculin tests. All suggestively positive tine reactors should, therefore, be retested with a Mantoux test to avoid false-negative interpretation of the tines.