The study was an exploratory in nature conducted using a large number of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes of diverse growth habit and adaptive characters. Soil flooding induced changes in eleven morpho-physiological characters of one-week old seedlings of 530 mungbean genotypes was compared in the study. The first and second principal components (PC) of principal component analysis (PCA) results accounted for 58 and 14%, respectively of the total variations of mungbean genotypes. The variation for first PC was composed mainly of relative dry weight (DW) of shoot and leaf as well as total DW. The second PC distinguished the genotypes that produced larger root system. There were seven clusters distinguished in the cluster analysis. The genotypes in cluster 4 and 6 performed better in respect of relative total DW and relative root DW, respectively and hence having flooding tolerance. The genotypes in clusters 7 and 1 performed very poorly and those of under clusters 3, 2 and 5 were moderate to poor. D 2 analysis indicated that the clusters differed significantly from each other. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) reaffirmed that more than 90% of the genotypes were correctly assigned to clusters. Both PCA and DFA confirmed that the relative total DW followed by shoot and leaf DW as well as leaf area were the major discriminatory variables and the root : shoot ratio and root DW were the secondary important variables to distinguish genotypes into groups. In this study, multivariate analyses were used in identifying the mungbean genotypes of desirable traits for flooding tolerance.
An experiment was conducted in a venylhouse at the environmental stress site of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur during September to December 2012 to determine the changes of photosynthesis and some related traits under drought stress in soybean genotypes. Four studied genotypes viz. Shohag, BARI Soybean 6 and BD2331 (relatively stress tolerant) and BGM2026 (susceptible) were tested against two water regimes such as water stress and non-stress. Results indicated that gas exchange characteristics were positively correlated with plant growth. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance showed more reduction in susceptible genotypes than the tolerant ones. Transpiration rate was found minimal in tolerant genotypes. Changes in leaf growth attributes of the four selected genotypes were compared under drought (water) stress conditions which is one of the major plant parts related to gas exchange. Generally, drought stress decreased the leaf area more in susceptible genotype than tolerant genotype. From the result, genotype BGM2026 which recorded the lowest photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, leaf area but highest transpiration rate was considered as drought susceptible whereas BARI Soybean-6, Shohag and BD2331 were more drought stress tolerant which have better mechanisms of drought tolerance.
Flooding-induced changes in leaf gas exchanges, grain yield, and yield-related parameters of mungbean were evaluated employing two flood-tolerant (GK48 and VC3945A) and one flood-susceptible (Vo1982A-G) genotypes. Three flooding regimes viz. 1, 3 and 7-day were imposed at vegetative, flowering, and pod-fill stages. Flooding caused a drastic reduction in photosynthesis rates (P n ), irrespective of flooding duration. However, the flooded plants recovered P n to a large extent depending on genotypes. Used genotypes showed a significant variation in P n during and after flooding. Post-flooding recovery in P n of GK48 and VC3945A was more pronounced at the vegetative and flowering stages than the pod-fill stage. At the pod-fill stage, only plants of GK48 survived when flooding prolonged for 7 days. Flooded plants showed higher intercellular CO 2 concentrations (C i ), and reduced stomatal conductance (g s ). However, during recovery, P n increased significantly along with reduced C i in flood-tolerant GK48 and VC3945A genotypes. In contrast, C i remained high and P n recovery was minimal in floodsusceptible Vo1982A-G genotype. This implies that mesophyll tolerance rather than stomatal factor might be the major limitation of P n recovery in a susceptible genotype. Very weak relationship between P n and transpiration rate (T r ) indicated low water use efficiency (WUE) in flooded plants, but subsequent recovery of both the parameters, suggesting higher WUE, particularly in tolerant genotypes. Seed yield of mungbean was the product of number of pods per plant and seed size, and longer the flooding period, the lower were the pods per plant at the flowering and pod-fill stage. Flooding reduced seed yield in all the three genotypes, but the extent of reduction was much less in flood-tolerant GK48 and VC3945A. Higher yield of flood-tolerant genotypes may be attributed to the rapid recovery of leaf gas exchanges.
An experiment was conducted in a venyl house at the environmental stress site of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University during September to December 2012 to know the internal water status under drought stress in soybean genotypes, viz. Shohag, BARI Soybean-6, BD2331 (relatively stress tolerant) and BGM2026 (susceptible). Drought (water) stress reduced the leaf water potential in all the genotypes though was more negative in tolerant genotypes than in susceptible ones. The lowest leaf water potential was obtained from BARI Soybean-6 (-1.58 MPa) and the highest in BGM2026 (-1.2 MPa). Relative water content (RWC) decreased remarkably in all the genotypes and reduction was more in susceptible than tolerant genotypes. At 8.00 am, RWC of stressed plants decreased by 9.58, 9.02, 8.90 and 13.90% in the genotype Shohag,, BARI Soybean-6, BD2331 and BGM2026 at vegetative stage, respectively. Drought stress decreased the exudation rate in all the genotypes of soybean and it was 24, 27, 22 and 12 mg h -1 in the genotype Shohag, BARI Soybean-6, BD2331 and BGM2026 at vegetative stage, respectively. Leaf temperatures in drought stressed plant were higher than in well-watered plants. Shohag, BARI Soybean-6, BD2331 and BGM2026 showed 4.7, 4.5 5.2 and 11.07% increase in leaf temperature due to water stress. At drought stressed treatment reduction in leaf water potential, relative water content, exudation rate and water retention capacity were noticed at the three growth stages in all the genotypes with a concurrent increase in leaf temperature. Genotypes BARI Soybean-6, Shohag and BD2331 showed considerably less reduction in relative water content, exudation rate and water retention capacity, high reduction in leaf water potential and less increase in leaf temperature during drought were considered as drought tolerant. However genotype BGM2026 showed considerably high reduction in relative water content, exudation rate and water retention capacity, low reduction in leaf water potential and high increase in leaf temperature was considered as drought susceptible.Keywords: Drought, stress, soybean, genotypes INTRODUCTION Water is absolutely necessary for the functioning of protoplasm of cell. Water deficit stress affects water status in plant. Thus adequacy and inadequacy of water are the limiting factors for life both in land and water environment (Onwugbuta-Enyi, 2004). Several methods are used to characterize plant water status under water stress conditions. Determination of water relation components in whole plant or cellular level is important for determination of tolerance genotypes to environmental stresses especially to water deficit stress. It may be possible to improve the water stress tolerance of soybean by understanding the water relation parameters that are associated with high productivity. Among the several methods used to characterize internal plant water status under water stress conditions, relative water content and leaf water potential are used as the indicators of degree of water stres...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.