Hereditary dentin disorders include dentinogenesis imperfecta (DGI) and dentin dysplasia (DD), which are autosomal dominant diseases characterized by altered dentin structure such as abnormality in dentin mineralization and the absence of root dentin. Shields classified DGI into three subgroups and DD into two subtypes. Although they are all hereditary dentin diseases, they do not share the same causative genes. To date, the pathogenic genes of DGI type I, which is considered a clinical manifestation of syndrome osteogenesis imperfecta, include COL1A1 and COL1A2. Mutations of the DSPP gene, which encodes the dentin sialophosphoprotein, a major non-collagenous protein, are responsible for three isolated dentinal diseases: DGI-II, DGI-III, and DD-II. However, DD-I appears to be special in that researchers have found three pathogenicity genes-VPS4B, SSUH2, and SMOC2-in three affected families from different countries. It is believed that DD-I is a genetically heterogeneous disease and is distinguished from other types of dentin disorders. This review summarizes the DD-I literature in the context of clinical appearances, radiographic characteristics, and functions of its pathogenic genes and aims to serve clinicians in further understanding and diagnosing this disease.

What are the novel findings of this work?Trio-based prenatal exome sequencing (pES) had an incremental yield of 31% in ongoing pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies but undiagnosed by copy-number variant sequencing (CNV-seq). Comprehensive analysis of nuclear exome coding and splicing regions, as well as mitochondrial genome, provided not only diagnostic findings but also incidental findings (in 7.8% cases) that were important for affected families. What are the clinical implications of this work?Trio-based pES is an efficient diagnostic method for families with fetal ultrasound anomalies and normal CNV-seq results. The incidental findings and parental carrier status detected by trio-based pES extend its clinical application, but careful genetic counseling is warranted.

Objective: To assess the performance of diverse prenatal diagnostic approaches for nuchal translucency (NT) thickening and to investigate the optimal prenatal screening or diagnostic action with a NT thickening of 95th percentile-3.50 mm.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,328 pregnancies with NT ≥ 95th percentile through ultrasound-guided transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis, or cordocentesis obtained clinical samples (chorionic villi, amniotic fluid, and cord blood), and real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR), chromosome karyotyping (CS), chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), or whole exome sequencing (WES) were provided to identify genetic etiologies.Results: In this study, the incidence of chromosomal defects increased with NT thickness. When NT ≥ 6.5 mm, 71.43% were attributed to genetic abnormalities. The 994 gravidas with fetal NT thickening underwent short tandem repeat (STR), CS, and CMA. In 804 fetuses with normal karyotypes, CMA detected 16 (1.99%) extra pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs). The incremental yield of CMA was only 1.16% (3/229) and 3.37% (10/297) in the group with NT 95th percentile-2.99 mm and NT 3.0–3.49 mm, separately. Among the 525 gravidas with fetal NT thickening who underwent STR, CMA, and WES, the incremental yield of WES was 4.09% (21/513). In the group of NT 95th percentile-2.99 mm, there were no additional single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) detected in WES, while in 143 cases with NT of 3.0–3.49 mm, the incremental yield of WES was 5.59% (8/143).Conclusion: In the group of NT 95th percentile-3.0 mm, since chromosomal aneuploidy and chromosomal copy number variation were the primary causes and the additional contribution of CMA and WES was not significant, we recommend NIPT-Plus for pregnant women with a NT thickening of 95th percentile-3.0 mm first. In addition, comprehensive prenatal genetic testing involving CMA and WES can benefit pregnancies with NT thickening of 3.0–3.49 mm.