No abstract

What is known and objective The influence of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO) on the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of vancomycin in recipients after lung transplantation (LTx) is unknown. We investigated whether VV‐ECMO influences vancomycin PPK and determined optimal recommended dosage for patients after LTx. Methods We tested vancomycin serum concentration and calculated PPK parameters using NONMEM. To check for any potential influence of ECMO on vancomycin PK, we compared ECMO patients with a non‐ECMO patient control group, and patients before and after ECMO weaning as self‐control to analysed changes in vancomycin PK. Monte Carlo dosing simulation was conducted to explore vancomycin dosing regimens. Results Nineteen ECMO and 6 non‐ECMO lung transplant recipients were enrolled. Vancomycin serum concentrations did not significantly differ between patients with and without ECMO support. Comparison of separate vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models showed that ECMO patients had smaller peripheral compartment volume of distribution (V2) [Estimate (relative standard error, RSE, %) 19.7 (12) vs. 22 (17) L, P = .003] than non‐ECMO patients. For treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with MIC ≤ 0.5 µg/mL, venous infusion of 400 mg vancomycin every 8 hours was recommended. For MRSA infection with MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL, the proposed dosage was 600 mg every 8 hours. What is new and conclusion Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation slightly alters vancomycin PK but does not significantly impact vancomycin serum concentration in patients after LTx. Dose adjustment is not necessary for VV‐ECMO support. Specific vancomycin dosing regimens with lower nephrotoxicity may benefit LTx recipients with VV‐ECMO.

Introduction: The most common physiological and psychological disorders associated with critical care patients are pain and anxiety. Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used to relieve these symptoms. However, the adverse effects of sedatives and analgesics are common and inevitable. As a new type of sedative drug, limited number of trials are available to evaluate Remimazolam Besylate's availability and safety compared with propofol.Methods: This study is a single center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. A total of 84 patients who meet ERAS criteria and receive mechanical ventilation in ICU, aged ≥18 years old will be included. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: Remimazolam Besylate group and Propofol group. The Primary outcomes includes satisfaction rate of sedation and incidence rate of major clinical events. Secondary outcomes including incidence of delirium, time to weaning and extubation, Difficulty of nursing RASS, BIS and PI, 28-days survival, side-effect and vital signs during medications, total dose and dose per kilogram body weight of analgesic and sedatives and incidence of rescue therapy in experimental group.Ethics and Dissemination: This trial has been approved by the ethics boards of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Recruitment began in January 2022 and will continue until June 2022. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, stakeholder engagement efforts and presentation to the public via lay media outlets.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04947345

No abstract