SubjectiveSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in polio survivors. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent type. Full polysomnography (PSG) is recommended for OSA diagnosis in patients with comorbidities by current practice guidelines, but it is not always accessible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether type 3 portable monitor (PM) or type 4 PM might be a viable alternative to PSG for the diagnosis of OSA in postpolio subjects.MethodsA total of 48 community-living polio survivors (39 men and 9 women) with an average age of 54.4 ± 5.3 years referred for the evaluation of OSA and who volunteered to participate were recruited. First, they completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire and underwent pulmonary function testing and blood gas tests the day before PSG night. Then, they underwent an overnight in-laboratory PSG with a type 3 PM and type 4 PM recording simultaneously.ResultsThe AHI from PSG, respiratory event index (REI) from type 3 PM, and ODI3 from type 4 PM was 30.27 ± 22.51/h vs. 25.18 ± 19.11/h vs. 18.28 ± 15.13/h, respectively (P < 0.001). For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 95.45 and 50%, respectively. For AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 87.88% and 93.33%, respectively. The Bland–Altman analysis of REI on PM vs. AHI on PSG showed a mean difference of −5.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −7.10, −3.08; P < 0.001) with limits of agreement ranging from −18.67 to 8.49 events/h. ROC curve analysis for patients with REI ≥ 15/h showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of ODI3 from type 4 PM were 86.36 and 75%, respectively. For patients with AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity was 66.67%, and the specificity was 100%.ConclusionType 3 PM and Type 4 PM could be alternative ways to screen OSA for polio survivors, especially for moderate to severe OSA.
Introduction Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is considered to be an autoimmune disease, and streptococcal infection may be an environmental trigger. However, previous studies from Asian narcolepsy patients did not reveal elevated anti-streptolysin O [ASO]. The aim is to investigate whether large sample Chinese patients with NT1 have an increase in antistreptococcal antibody titers. Methods A total of 214 narcolepsy patients and 360 healthy controls were recruited. All patients were DQB1*0602 positive with clear-cut cataplexy or had low CSF hypocretin-1. Participants were tested for ASO and anti DNAse B [ADB]. These patients were divided into five groups according to disease duration, including 29 patients less than 3 months; 25 from 3 months to 1 year; 40 from 1 to 3 years; 61 from 3 to 10 years and 59 patients over 10 years. Comparison was also made between children and adults with age matched controls, respectively. Results There were no significant differences between patients and healthy controls in regard to both ASO ≥ 200 IU (19.2% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.50) and ADB≥480IU (9.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.86). For children narcolepsy patients, ASO positive rates(19.8% vs. 18%, p = 0.68) and ADB positive rates(10.4% vs. 12%, p = 0.72) had no differences compared to age matched controls. And no difference was observed in adult narcolepsy patients either, with ASO positive rates (18.5% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.39) and ADB positive rates (9.3% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.42) compared to age matched controls, respectively. ASO (ADB) positive rates had no significant differences among different disease duration groups(p= 0.55, 0.9). Conclusion It is indicated that positive rates of ASO and ADB were not significantly different between Chinese patients with NT1 and healthy controls, including recent onset cases and children. Support The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81420108002 and NO. 81570083)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.