No abstract

We aimed to compare the labor analgesia effects of nonpharmaceutical analgesia and pharmaceutical analgesia on parturient women.Methods: One hundred and four parturient women with spontaneous births were selected and randomly divided into pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical analgesia groups. Before and after analgesia, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), parturient satisfaction with analgesia, serum pain stress factors (substance P [SP], neuropeptide Y [NPY], nerve growth factor [NGF], and prostaglandin E2 [PGE2]), duration of labor, vaginal bleeding at 2 h postpartum, postpartum urinary retention and dysuria incidence, Apgar score of 1 min and 5 min after birth, and neonatal cord blood gas analysis (pH, partial pressure of oxygen [PO 2 ], partial pressure of carbon dioxide [PCO 2 ], and lactate [Lac]) were compared in the two groups.Results: VAS scores were lower and the analgesia satisfaction was higher in the pharmaceutical analgesia group than in the nonpharmaceutical analgesia group (all p < .05). Serum levels of SP, NPY, NGF, and PGE2 in the pharmaceutical analgesia group were lower than those in the nonpharmaceutical analgesia group (all p < .05). The first and second stages of labor were longer and the bleeding volume at 2 h postpartum was greater in the pharmaceutical analgesia group than those in the nonpharmaceutical analgesia group (all p < .05). Reduced Lac and PCO 2 levels and increased PO 2 level were found in the pharmaceutical analgesia group in comparison to the nonpharmaceutical analgesia group (all p < .05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the analgesic effect and neonatal condition of the pharmaceutical analgesia are better than the nonpharmaceutical analgesia, but the labor duration and postpartum bleeding volume of

Background: Rotator cuff injury is the most common cause of shoulder dysfunction. Despite the continuous advancement of surgical techniques, the incidence of re-tearing after rotator cuff repair is still high. The main reason is that it is difficult to reconstruct the normal tendon bone interface and the process is slow, and the application of tissue engineering technology can promote tendon and bone healing. This study will evaluate the effect of the bionic double membrane stent on the rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the effect of biomimetic double-layer biofilm stent on rotator cuff healing. Approved by the clinical research ethics committee of our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into 1 of 2 treatment options: (A) a biomimetic double-layer biofilm stent group and (B) a non-bionic dual-layer biofilm stent group. Observation indicators include: visual analog scale score, University of California Los Angeles score, American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons score and Constant-Murley score. Data were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS version 16.0 (Chicago, IL). Discussion: This study will evaluate and evaluate the effect of the bionic double-layer membrane stent on the rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The results of this experiment will provide new treatment ideas for promoting rotator cuff tendon bone healing. OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/FWKD6

No abstract