Background. Regional analgesia for tubeless, uniport, thoracoscopic wedge resection of benign peripheral nodules is generally performed by intercostal nerve block (INB). We examined the effectiveness of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), in comparison to the traditional intercostal blocks, for the procedure. Methods. Between July 2016 and December 2016, 20 consecutive patients with solitary benign peripheral lung nodules underwent tubeless uniport thoracoscopic wedge resection using thoracic PVB (PVB group). The clinical outcomes were compared with those of 20 other consecutive patients who underwent the same procedure under the conventional INB, between January 2016 and July 2016 (INB group). In both groups, the procedures were performed without endotracheal intubation, urinary catheterization, or chest tube drainage. Results. The clinical data of patients in both groups were comparable in terms of demographic and baseline characteristics, operative and anesthetic characteristics, puncture-related complications, and postoperative anesthetic adverse events. No puncture-related complications occurred during the perioperative period in either group. The threshold values for mechanical pain at postoperative hours 4 and 8 were significantly higher in the PVB group than in the INB group. Furthermore, the incidence of nausea or vomiting in the PVB group was significantly less than that in the INB group. None of the patients required reintervention or readmission to our hospital. Conclusions. Tubeless uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection for solitary benign peripheral lung nodules using thoracic PVB for regional analgesia is a feasible and safe procedure. Moreover, we found that thoracic PVB is less painful than INB.

Background: In patients under esophagectomy, early postoperative oral feeding has traditionally been contraindicated to minimize the risk of anastomotic leaks. Because early oral feeding preserves the integrity and function of gut mucosa, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative early oral feeding on esophagectomy.Methods: Between Oct 2013 and Jan 2016, 41 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma (stages I-III), who had undergone minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis surgery, were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly arranged into the early oral feeding (EOF) group (21 cases) and the simple tube feeding (STF) group (20 cases). The nutritional goal for both groups was 25 kcal/(kg•day). The patients in the EOF group were tube-fed with enteral nutrition and orally fed with 5% glucose in normal saline during the first 4 postoperative days, after that the patients were placed on a liquid diet. The patients in the STF group were postoperatively tube-fed with enteral nutrition for 7 days before being switched to liquid diet. The length of the postoperative hospital stay, rate of perioperative complications, and overall mortality were recorded.Preoperative and postoperative levels of serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), transferrin (TP), and C reactive protein (CRP) were also monitored.Results: There were no significant differences of the incidence of postoperative complications and overall mortality between the EOF group and the STF group, but the duration of hospital stay, interval until the first liquid food, and time of ambulation in the EOF group were lower than those of the STF group (P<0.05).EOF patients also showed significantly lower CRP levels compared with the STF group (P<0.05).Conclusions: EOF might reduce the duration of hospital stays and CRP levels in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy while the mortality and complications were not affected.

Background: Early removal of the chest tube has advantages of reducing postoperative pain and speed recovery. This study aimed to confirm its safety and feasibility of early removal of a pigtail catheter used as a chest drain in patients undergoing anatomical surgery.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 126 patients who removed pigtail catheter ≤24 h after surgery, and 56 patients >24 h who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (u-VATS) between January 2020 and April 2022. All patients had stage I lung cancer and underwent anatomical surgery (lobectomy or segmentectomy). The clinical characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications of both groups were analyzed and compared. Results:The >24 h group had more patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) (P<0.001), a lower forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (P<0.001), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P<0.001), and current smokers (P=0.006) than the ≤24 h group. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, type of resection, operation time, and bleeding loss between the two groups (P>0.05).The pain of patients in the ≤24 h group was significantly less than that in the >24 h group only on the third postoperative day (P=0.035). There were no significant differences in the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative day 0, day 1, day 7, and 1 month between the two groups (P>0.05). With the exception of a higher occurrence of subcutaneous emphysema in the >24 h group (71.7% vs. 100%, P=0.001), there were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative complications (e.g., pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, atelectasis, pleural effusion, and wound infection) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). During the 30day follow-up period, none of the patients required tube reinsertion for pneumothorax. A total of 8 patients in the ≤24 h group and 4 in the >24 h group required tube reinsertion (6.7% vs. 7.1%, P>0.99) due to pleural effusion. Conclusions:In stage I lung cancer patients who underwent u-VATS anatomic surgery, the pigtail catheter used as a thoracic drainage tube removed with 24 h after was safe and feasible.

No abstract