Acetylene dimerization is necessary to the coal chemical industry for producing monovinylacetylene, while the deactivation mechanism and regeneration of catalysts have not been studied in detail, which is crucial to the design of high-efficiency catalysts for acetylene dimerization. Herein, the deactivation mechanism and regeneration methods of CuCl/activated carbon catalysts in gas−solid acetylene dimerization were studied in detail. The catalysts with different reaction times were analyzed by temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH 3 -TPD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), thermogravimetry (TG), pyridine-FTIR, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. NH 3 -TPD results demonstrated that as the time went on, the strong acid in the samples was enhanced, while the weak acid was weakened. Similarly, pyridine-FTIR results indicated that both Bronsted and Lewis acids in the samples were decreased. TG and XPS results showed that the reasons for deactivation for acetylene dimerization in the gas−solid reaction were significantly affected by coke deposition and the change of Cu valence. The more the content of Cu + , the higher the acetylene conversion rate, implying that Cu + may be the active center of the acetylene dimerization reaction. Thus, removing carbon deposition through calcining and increasing the content of Cu + was an effective way of regenerating the catalyst. This work strengthened the understanding of the deactivation behavior and provides a practicable regeneration method for the catalyst in gas−solid acetylene dimerization.
The Zn-1.5MSA/MCM-41 catalyst with 99% C2H2 conversion, and selectivity to CH3CHO was above 70% within 150 h. MSA ligand was added could improve catalyst dispersion. The catalyst aggregation and Zn species loss were the main reasons for the Zn-based catalyst deactivation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.