Background Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with PLSVC can be challenging because of the venous anomalies. We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent PPI with double active fixation leads. Methods From January 2012 to July 2016, 9 patients (three male and six females, mean age 68 ± 11 years) with PLSVC who received a dual-chamber pacemaker with double active fixation leads were enrolled retrospectively in this observational study. The indications for pacemaker implantation were symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block in one and sick sinus syndrome in eight patients. Results PPI were implanted successfully in all 9 patients. Successful positioning of the ventricular leads at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septum with a “C” shaped stylet was achieved in 7 patients (77.8%). In the remaining two cases, the ventricular leads were placed in the right ventricular apex and the inferior free wall of the sub-tricuspid annulus. The atrial leads were placed at the lateral wall of the right atrium in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 85.3 ± 11.3 min and 4.5 ± 1.1 min respectively. During a mean follow-up of 4 years, no complications were observed and pacing parameters did not change significantly. Conclusion PPI through PLSVC may be technically feasible, safe, and effective. Double active fixation leads may be standard for patients with PLSVC and most of the ventricular leads could be placed at the RVOT septum.

Background The ECG characteristics of the distal coronary venous system ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) share common features with VAs arising from the aortic cusps or the endocardial left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) beneath the cusps. The purpose of this study was to identify specific electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics of VAs originating from the distal great cardiac vein (GCV). Methods Based on the successful ablation site, patients with idiopathic VAs from the distal GCV, left coronary cusp (LCC) or the subvalvular left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area were included in the present study. Results The final population consisted of 39 patients (35 males, mean age 51 ± 23 years). All VAs displayed a right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology with inferior axis. Among these patients, 15 were successfully ablated at the GCV, 15 at the LCC and 9 at the subvalvular region. A “w” pattern in lead I was present in 12 out of 15 (80%) VAs originating from the distal GCV compared to none of VAs arising from the other two sites ( p < 0.01). VAs with a GCV origin exhibited more commonly increased intrinsicoid deflection time, higher maximum deflection index and wider QRS duration compared to LCC and subvalvular sites ( p < 0.05). Acceptable pace mapping at the successful ablation site was achieved in 10 patients. After an average of 36 ± 24 months follow up, 14 (93.3%) patients were free from VAs recurrence. Conclusion A “w” pattern in lead I may distinguish distal GCV VAs from VAs arising from the LCC or the subvalvular region. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1064-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.