Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant disease and has the worst prognosis and survival rate. TUBA1C is a microtubule component implicated in multiple cancers, however, the clinical significance and biological functions of TUBA1C in the progression of PDAC remain unexplored. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) data were employed to detect the TUBA1C mRNA expression and the relation between TUBA1C expression and overall survival (OS) in PDAC. Then, bioinformatic analysis was employed to determine the potential pathway and genes related to TUBA1C. Human pancreatic cancer tissue and adjacent non-tumor tissues samples were detected by immunochemistry (IHC) staining, and the correlation between TUBA1C expression and the clinicopathological features were investigated. Meanwhile, TUBA1C expression in PDAC cell lines was evaluated by western blotting. Furthermore, functional assays including cell viability, apoptosis, cell cycle, transwell assay, wound healing assay, and a xenograft tumor model were performed to determine the oncogenic role of TUBA1C in PDAC, respectively. Results: TUBA1C was overexpressed in the PDAC tissues and cells. IHC analysis showed that the TUBA1C overexpression was associated with short OS. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that TUBA1C overexpression was mainly associated with cell cycle regulation. The downregulation of TUBA1C significantly suppressed cell proliferation, induced cell apoptosis and cycle arrest, and inhibited invasion and migration in PDAC cells. Furthermore, TUBA1C downregulation also inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Albahde et al. Elevated TUBA1C Expression in PDAC Conclusion: These findings suggested that TUBA1C downregulation suppressed PDAC aggressiveness via cell cycle pathway and that TUBA1C may serve as a potential prognostic marker for PDAC therapy.

No abstract

Background: Because the overall prognosis remains dismal for patients with resected pancreatic cancer (PC), we aimed to explore the prognostic impact of examined lymph node (ELN) count on lymph node (LN)-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients' data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (National Cancer Institute, USA) to investigate the relationship between ELN count and survival outcomes of LN-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Results: A total of 700 patients were included, and the median number of ELNs was 11. The respective 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 75.3%, 37.7%, 30.3%, and the 1-, 3-, 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 78.3%, 41.7%, 34.5%. The X-tile analysis showed that 14 was the most optimal cutoff for both OS and CSS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that patients with ELNs >14 had better OS and CSS than ELNs ≤14. Multivariate Cox analysis showed ELNs ≤14 was an independent risk factor for both OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.357; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.080-1.704; P=0.

Background and Aims: The best treatment modalities for elderly patients with stage I-II HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) remain controversial in an era of a shortage of liver donors.Methods: From the SEER database (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program), 2,371 elderly patients were sampled as Cohort 1. OS (Overall Survival) and CSS (Cancer-Specific Survival) were compared between the Non-surgery and Surgery groups. A stratification analysis in a CSS Cox model was also conducted among sub-groups, and propensity score matching was performed to generate Cohort 2 (746 pairs), reducing the influences of confounders.Results: For Cohort 1, the median follow-up times of the Non-surgery and Surgery groups were 11 months (95% CI, confidence interval: 9.74-12.26) vs. 49 months (44.80-53.21) in OS, and 14 months (12.33-15.67) vs. 74 months (64.74-83.26) in CSS, respectively. In the stratification analysis, for the elderly patients (age >= 70 years), Larger Resection was associated with a higher HR (hazard ratio) than Segmental Resection: 0.30 (95% CI, confidence interval: 0.22-0.41) vs. 0.29 (0.21-0.38) in 70-74 year-olds; 0.26 (0.18-0.38) vs. 0.23 (0.16-0.32) in 75-79 year-olds; 0.32 (0.21-0.49) vs. 0.21 (0.13-0.32) in those 80+ years old. For Cohort 2, a similar result could be seen in the CSS Cox forest plot. The HRs of Larger Resection and Segmental Resection were 0.27 (0.21-0.33) and 0.25 (0.20-0.31), respectively.Conclusions: It is cautiously recommended that, when liver transplantation is not available, segmental or wedge liver resection is the better treatment choice for elderly patients with stage I-II HCC (AJCC edition 6), especially those over 70 years old, compared with other surgeries, based on the SEER data.