IntroductionSevere sepsis is associated with a high mortality rate despite implementation of guideline recommendations. Adjunctive treatment may be efficient and require further investigation. In light of the crucial role of immunologic derangement in severe sepsis, thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) is considered as a promising beneficial immunomodulatory drug. The trial is to evaluate whether Tα1 improves 28-day all-cause mortality rates and immunofunction in patients with severe sepsis.MethodsWe performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial in six tertiary, teaching hospitals in China between May 12, 2008 and Dec 22, 2010. Eligible patients admitted in ICU with severe sepsis were randomly allocated by a central randomization center to the control group or Tα1 group (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was death from any cause and was assessed 28 days after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included dynamic changes of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) on day 0, 3, 7 in both groups. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis.ResultsA total of 361 patients were allocated to either the control group (n = 180) or Tα1 (n = 181) group. The mortalities from any cause within 28 days in the Tα1 group and control group were 26.0% and 35.0% respectively with a marginal P value (nonstratified analysis, P = 0.062; log rank, P = 0.049); the relative risk of death in the Tα1 group as compared to the control group was 0.74 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.02). Greater improvement of mHLA-DR was observed in the Tα1 group on day 3 (mean difference in mHLA-DR changes between the two groups was 3.9%, 95% CI 0.2 to 7.6%, P = 0.037) and day 7 (mean difference in mHLA-DR changes between the two groups was 5.8%, 95% CI 1.0 to 10.5%, P = 0.017) than in the control group. No serious drug-related adverse event was recorded.ConclusionsThe use of Tα1 therapy in combination with conventional medical therapies may be effective in improving clinical outcomes in a targeted population of severe sepsis.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00711620.
Background
Hypophosphatemia generally occurs in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), but its impact is often ignored. The aim of this study was to investigate whether hypophosphatemia can be a risk factor for ICU 28-day mortality.
Methods
A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting data from 1073 patients admitted to general ICU and then presented to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The patients were divided into a normal control group (serum phosphate levels 0.80–1.60 mmol/L) and a hypophosphatemia group (serum phosphate levels < 0.80 mmol/L), based on the concentration of phosphorus at the time of ICU admission. The association between phosphate levels and ICU 28-day mortality was evaluated by binary logistic regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to predict the ICU 28-day mortality.
Results
The cohort included 946 patients with a median phosphate concentration of 0.77 mmol/L (interquartile range 0.55–1.03 mmol/L). Patients with hypophosphatemia had a higher ICU 28-day mortality than the normal control group (33.3% vs 24.0%,
P
< 0.05). Patients with hypophosphatemia had a longer ICU and hospital stays, and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (all
P
< 0.05). Hypophosphatemia was an independent risk factor for ICU 28-day mortality (adjusted OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1–2.1,
P
= 0.01) in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Conclusions
Hypophosphatemia at admission is an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality in general ICU patients.
Trial registration
The medical study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Six Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Approval number: 2017ZSLYEC-110). No consent was given as the data were analyzed anonymously.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.