In this article we describe the OpenMolcas environment and invite the computational chemistry community to collaborate. The open-source project already includes a large number of new developments realized during the transition from the commercial MOLCAS product to the open-source platform. The paper initially describes the technical details of the new software development platform. This is followed by brief presentations of many new methods, implementations, and features of the OpenMolcas program suite. These developments include novel wave function methods such as stochastic complete active space self-consistent field, density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) methods, and hybrid multiconfigurational
MOLCAS/OpenMolcas is an ab initio electronic structure program providing a large set of computational methods from Hartree–Fock and density functional theory to various implementations of multiconfigurational theory. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the main features of the code, specifically reviewing the use of the code in previously reported chemical applications as well as more recent applications including the calculation of magnetic properties from optimized density matrix renormalization group wave functions.
This paper presents an in-depth study of the performance of multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2, NEVPT2) in describing spin state energetics in first-row transition metal (TM) systems, including bare TM ions, TM ions in a field of point charges (TM/PC), and an extensive series of TM complexes, where the main focus lies on the (3s3p) correlation contribution to the relative energies of different spin states. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic NEVPT2 investigation of TM spin state energetics. CASPT2 has been employed in several previous studies but was regularly found to be biased toward high spin states. The bias was attributed to a too low value of the so-called IPEA shift ϵ, an empirical correction in the CASPT2 zeroth-order Hamiltonian with a standard value of 0.25 hartree. Based on comparisons with experiment (TM ions) and calculations with the multireference configuration interaction (TM ions and TM/PC systems) and coupled-cluster (TM complexes) methods, we demonstrate in this work that standard CASPT2 works well for valence correlation and that its bias toward high-spin states is caused by an erratic description of (3s3p) correlation effects. The latter problem only occurs for spin transitions involving a ligand field (de)excitation, not in bare TM ions. At the same time the (3s3p) correlation contribution also becomes strongly ϵ dependent. The error can be reduced by increasing ϵ but only at the expense of deteriorating the CASPT2 description of valence correlation in the TM complexes. The alternative NEVPT2 method works well for bare TM and TM/PC systems, but its results for the TM complexes are disappointing, with large errors both for the valence and (3s3p) correlation contributions to the relative energies of different spin states.
In previous work on the performance of multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) in describing spin state energetics in first-row transition metal systems [ Pierloot et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017 , 13 , 537 - 553 ], we showed that standard CASPT2 works well for valence correlation but does not describe the metal semicore (3s3p) correlation effects accurately. This failure is partially responsible for the well-known bias toward high-spin states of CASPT2. In this paper, we expand our previous work and show that this bias could be partly removed with a combined CASPT2/CC approach: using high-quality CASPT2 with extensive correlation-consistent basis sets for valence correlation and low-cost CCSD(T) calculations with minimal basis sets for the metal semicore (3s3p) correlation effects. We demonstrate that this approach is efficient by studying the spin state energetics of a series of iron complexes modeling important intermediates in oxidative catalytic processes in chemistry and biochemistry. On the basis of a comparison with bare CCSD(T) results from this and previous work, the average error of the CASPT2/CC approach is estimated at around 2 kcal mol in favor of high spin states.
The complete active space second order perturbation theory (CASPT2) can be extended to larger active spaces by using the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) as solver. Two variants are commonly used: the costly DMRG-CASPT2 with exact 4-particle reduced density matrix (4-RDM) and the cheaper DMRG-cu(4)-CASPT2 in which the 4-cumulant is discarded. To assess the accuracy and limitations of the latter variant DMRG-cu(4)-CASPT2 we study the spin state energetics of iron porphyrin Fe(P) and its model compound FeL2, a model for the active center of NiFe hydrogenase, and manganese-oxo porphyrin MnO(P)(+); a series of excited states of chromium hexacarbonyl Cr(CO)6; and the interconversion of two Cu2O2(2+) isomers. Our results clearly show that PT2 on top of DMRG is essential in order to obtain quantitative results for transition metal complexes. Good results were obtained with DMRG-cu(4)-CASPT2 as compared to full CASPT2 and DMRG-CASPT2 in calculations with small- and medium-sized active spaces. In calculations with large-sized active spaces (∼30 active orbitals), the performance of DMRG-cu(4)-CASPT2 is less impressive due to the errors originating from both the finite number of renormalized states m and the 4-RDM approximation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.