BackgroundCurrently, many scholars are concerned about the treatment of postoperative infection; however, few have completed multivariate analyses to determine factors that contribute to the risk of infection. Therefore, we conducted a multivariate analysis of a retrospectively collected database to analyze the risk factors for acute surgical site infection following lumbar surgery, including fracture fixation, lumbar fusion, and minimally invasive lumbar surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent lumbar surgery between 2014 and 2016, including lumbar fusion, internal fracture fixation, and minimally invasive surgery in our hospital’s spinal surgery unit. Patient demographics, procedures, and wound infection rates were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression analyses.ResultsTwenty-six patients (2.81%) experienced acute surgical site infection following lumbar surgery in our study. The patients’ mean body mass index, smoking history, operative time, blood loss, draining time, and drainage volume in the acute surgical site infection group were significantly different from those in the non-acute surgical site infection group (p < 0.05). Additionally, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, preoperative antibiotics, type of disease, and operative type in the acute surgical site infection group were significantly different than those in the non-acute surgical site infection group (p < 0.05). Using binary logistic regression analyses, body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, preoperative antibiotics, fracture, operative type, operative time, blood loss, and drainage time were independent predictors of acute surgical site infection following lumbar surgery.ConclusionsIn order to reduce the risk of infection following lumbar surgery, patients should be evaluated for the risk factors noted above.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13018-017-0612-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Lumbar 3-joint complex degeneration is a multifactorial, pathological process. Previous studies included insufficient quantitative analyses to prove the relationship between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis (OA). We assessed the correlation between intervertebral disc and lumbar facet joint degeneration using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters.A total of 152 participants who underwent conventional MRI and CT in the clinostat position were included in this study. The presence of lumbar disc degeneration was identified using the Pfirrmann grading system, and the presence of lumbar facet joint degeneration was identified using the Weishaupt grading system. Facet tropism was defined as a divergence more than 7° between the facet joint angles of both sides at the same segment. The intervertebral disc heights were also measured.Most facet joint OA probably appeared at the segment with intervertebral disc degeneration of more than grade III. Facet joint OA was significantly exacerbated with the progression of disc degeneration grade. The intervertebral height significantly decreased with the progression of facet joint degeneration grades, except for grades 0 and 1.Our current study found that each individual joint degeneration influences the other 2 in the lumbar 3-joint complex. Facet tropism was significantly associated with lumbar disc degeneration. Narrowing of the intervertebral disc height probably aggravates the facet joint degeneration further at the same level.

Objective To evaluate the short-term in vivo dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine (L3–S1) after unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) or bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) combined with TLIF for treatment of L4–5 lumbar degenerative disc diseases (DDD). Methods Twenty-eight patients were recruited (13 UPSF, 15 BPSF). Each patient was CT-scanned to construct 3D models of the L3–S1 vertebrae. The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) was then used to image the lumbar spine while the patient performed seven functional activities (upright standing, maximum extension, flexion, left–right twist, and left–right bend). The in vivo vertebral positions were reproduced using the 3D vertebral models and DFIS images. The ranges of motion (ROMs) of L3–4, L4–5, and L5–S1 segments were analyzed. Results At the index L4–5 segment, the primary ROM of left–right twist of the UPSF group (2.11 ± 0.52°) was significantly larger ( p = 0.000) than the BPSF group (0.73 ± 0.32°). At the proximal adjacent L3–4 segment, the primary ROMs of left–right twist, and left–right bend of the UPSF group (2.16 ± 0.73°, 2.28 ± 1.03°) were significantly less ( p = 0.003, 0.023) than the BPSF group (3.17 ± 0.88, 3.12 ± 1.04°), respectively. However, at distal adjacent L5–S1 segment, no significant difference was found between the two groups during all activities. Conclusions The ROM in left–right twisting of UPSF group was significantly larger compared with BPSF group at the index level in the short term. The UPSF has less impact on the cranial adjacent level (L3–4) in left–right twisting and bending activities compared to the BPSF. The data implied that the UPSE and BPSF combined with TLIF would result in different biomechanics in the index and cranial adjacent segment biomechanics. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to compare the clinical outcomes of the two surgeries. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1198-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Study Design. Kinematics of the cervical spine was investigated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images combined with three dimensions to three dimensions (3D-3D) registration technology in patients after anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) surgery.Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate in vivo 3D cervical motion characteristics of patients who had undergone AOSF surgeries. Summary of Background Data. AOSF surgery is a classic surgical method for the treatment of odontoid fracture, but there are few studies that investigated its effect on in vivo biomechanics of the cervical spine. Postoperative biomechanical characters of the atlantoaxial joint (C1-C2) and the caudal adjacent segment (C2-C3) have yet to be clarified. Methods. The study involved 14 patients subjected to a procedure of AOSF with lag screw. Subjects were matched with 14 healthy controls. All subjects underwent CBCT scanning of the cervical spine under seven functional positions. A 3D-3D registration was performed for each vertebra at each functional position to calculate the segmental motion characteristics. The ranges of motion (ROMs) of the C1-C2, C2-C3, and the overall cervical spine (C1-C7) for each of the functional positions were determined.Results. The ROMs of the AOSF group were significantly (P < 0.05) smaller than the control group in flexion-extension positions for the C1-C2 (7.08vs.11.08), C2-C3 (3.78vs.6.78) and C1-C7 (43.38vs.54.48). The twisting ROM of the C1-C2 was 39.38 in the AOSF group and 65.78 in the control (P < 0.05), the bending ROM of the C2-C3 was 2.88 in the AOSF group and 8.98 in the control (P < 0.05). The twisting ROM of C1-C7 segment was 63.28 for the AOSF and 98.18 for the healthy control groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion.Although AOSF surgery reduced the flexion-extension ROMs of all investigated spinal segments, additionally, it reduced twisting ROMs of C1-C2 and C1-C7, but only lateral bending ROM of C2-C3, when compared with the control group. The data implied that the AOSF surgery would result in different biomechanics changes in the atlantoaxial segment and caudal adjacent segment. Longer-term follow-up studies of larger patient cohorts are necessary to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients after the AOSF surgery.