DIII-D physics research addresses critical challenges for the operation of ITER and the next generation of fusion energy devices. This is done through a focus on innovations to provide solutions for high performance long pulse operation, coupled with fundamental plasma physics understanding and model validation, to drive scenario development by integrating high performance core and boundary plasmas. Substantial increases in off-axis current drive efficiency from an innovative top launch system for EC power, and in pressure broadening for Alfven eigenmode control from a co-/counter-I p steerable off-axis neutral beam, all improve the prospects for optimization of future long pulse/steady state high performance tokamak operation. Fundamental studies into the modes that drive the evolution of the pedestal pressure profile and electron vs ion heat flux validate predictive models of pedestal recovery after ELMs. Understanding the physics mechanisms of ELM control and density pumpout by 3D magnetic perturbation fields leads to confident predictions for ITER and future devices. Validated modeling of high-Z shattered pellet injection for disruption mitigation, runaway electron dissipation, and techniques for disruption prediction and avoidance including machine learning, give confidence in handling disruptivity for future devices. For the non-nuclear phase of ITER, two actuators are identified to lower the L–H threshold power in hydrogen plasmas. With this physics understanding and suite of capabilities, a high poloidal beta optimized-core scenario with an internal transport barrier that projects nearly to Q = 10 in ITER at ∼8 MA was coupled to a detached divertor, and a near super H-mode optimized-pedestal scenario with co-I p beam injection was coupled to a radiative divertor. The hybrid core scenario was achieved directly, without the need for anomalous current diffusion, using off-axis current drive actuators. Also, a controller to assess proximity to stability limits and regulate β N in the ITER baseline scenario, based on plasma response to probing 3D fields, was demonstrated. Finally, innovative tokamak operation using a negative triangularity shape showed many attractive features for future pilot plant operation.
Increased background pressure in vacuum chamber test facilities as compared to on-orbit operation has been shown to influence the operation of electric propulsion devices such as Hall thrusters. This study aims to elucidate the impact of pressure on the ionization and acceleration mechanisms in a stationary plasma thruster, model SPT-100 Hall thruster, using time-averaged and time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence velocimetry. The results are compared for the thruster operating at an applied 300 V (∼4.25 A), with vacuum facility background pressures ranging from 1.7 × 10 −5 to 8.0 × 10 −5 torr. Time-averaged measurements reveal that, in general, an upstream shift in the position of the ionization and acceleration regions occurs as the facility pressure is increased above the nominal 1.7 × 10 −5 torr. Time-resolved measurements, implemented using a sample-hold scheme with 1 μs resolution, emphasize that similar acceleration profiles are present within the Hall thruster discharge channel regardless of background pressure. Measurements taken at 3.5 × 10 −5 torr, where the facility background neutral density is similar to the neutral density emitted from the thruster, unexpectedly show increased ion acceleration over the next highest pressure condition at 5.0 × 10 −5 torr. These results indicate a not-yet well defined balance of the impacts of neutral ingestion, classical and turbulent electron transport on thruster operation, and that the ratio of the background to thruster neutral density is a more relevant benchmark than background pressure alone when evaluating Hall thruster operation.
The high density fluctuation poloidal wavenumber, kθ ( kθ > 8 cm−1, kθρs > 5, ρs is the ion gyro radius using the ion sound velocity), measurement capability of a new Doppler backscattering (DBS) system at the DIII-D tokamak has been experimentally evaluated. In DBS, wavenumber ( k) matching becomes more important at higher wavenumbers, owing to the exponential dependence of the measured signal loss factor on wave vector mismatch. Wave vector matching allows for the Bragg scattering condition to be satisfied, which minimizes the signal loss at higher k’s. In the previous DBS system, without toroidal wave vector matching, the measured DBS signal-to-noise ratio at higher kθ (>8 cm−1) is substantially reduced, making it difficult to measure higher kθ turbulence. The new DBS system has been optimized to access higher wavenumber, kθ [Formula: see text] 20 cm−1, density turbulence measurement. The optimization hardware addresses fluctuation wave vector matching using toroidal steering of the launch mirror to produce a backscattered signal with improved intensity. The probe’s sensitivity to high- k density fluctuations has been increased by approximately an order of magnitude compared to the old system that has been in use at DIII-D. Note that typical measurement locations are above or below the tokamak midplane on the low field side with normalized radial ranges of 0.5–1.0. The new DBS probe system with the toroidal matching of fluctuation wave vectors is thought to be critical to understanding high- k turbulent transport in fusion-relevant research at DIII-D.
A new Doppler backscattering (DBS) system has been installed and tested on the MAST-U spherical tokamak. It utilizes eight simultaneous fixed frequency probe beams (32.5, 35, 37.5, 40, 42.5, 45, 47.5, and 50 GHz). These frequencies provide a range of radial positions from the edge plasma to the core depending on plasma conditions. The system utilizes a combination of novel features to provide remote control of the probed density wavenumber, the launched polarization (X vs O-mode), and the angle of the launched DBS to match the magnetic field pitch angle. The range of accessible density turbulence wavenumbers ( k θ) is reasonably large with normalized wavenumbers k θ ρ s ranging from ≤0.5 to 9 (ion sound gyroradius ρ s = 1 cm). This wavenumber range is relevant to a variety of instabilities believed to be important in establishing plasma transport (e.g., ion temperature gradient, trapped electron, electron temperature gradient, micro-tearing, kinetic ballooning modes). The system is specifically designed to address the requirement of density fluctuation wavevector alignment which can significantly reduce the SNR if not accounted for.
Measurements of the E × B toroidal angular velocity, ω_E×B = Er /RB_θ (Er is the radial electric field, B_θ is the poloidal magnetic field), are made using the Doppler Back-Scattering (DBS) and Charge-Exchange Recombination Spectroscopy (CER) diagnostics. DBS uses the Doppler shift of wavenumber-resolved density fluctuations while CER uses the Doppler shift of impurity emission lines to independently measure plasma parameters for calculating the local radial electric field. DBS and CER profiles of ωE×B as a function of normalized toroidal flux (ρ) are compared at various levels of neutral beam applied torque on the plasma. Under standard neoclassical theory ω_E×B is a flux surface quantity, making it appropriate to compare across diagnostics. DBS and CER generally show good agreement when comparing ωE×B profiles at different levels of NBI-applied torque. Further, the DBS values have close to the same precision as CER values when averaged over a similar time-scale and effects such as prompt-torque are considered. DBS is able to observe the rapid (< 10 ms) modification of the Er profile by the diagnostic neutral beam ‘blips’. This modification is most pronounced when the blip applies a large relative change in torque on the plasma. Overall, these results could have implications on transport analysis and suggests using DBS and CER in conjunction to constrain values of the E ×B-shear (sometimes called γ_E×B ).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.