Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has in recent times become an important public health issue owing to the considerable health care resources utilized in its management, its deleterious effect on quality of life and the increasing prevalence of a relatively rare complication of reflux disease – esophageal adenocarcinoma. We review here the major current challenges in the field of reflux disease and its complications, and provide some approaches that may be useful in management. The issues to be faced include the very limited comprehension of the reasons behind the increasing prevalence of the disease, difficulties in correlating symptoms with objective data of pathological gastroesophageal reflux and the relatively unsophisticated tools we are employing to investigate the underlying pathophysiology. It is certain that the lack of well-defined and characterized methodologies to compare the effects of therapy require the development of more effective questionnaire-type analytic tools. In regard to treatment, there is little doubt that the widely prescribed proton pump inhibitors have dose-equivalent efficacy and are the most highly effective agents capable of suppressing acid, controlling many of the symptoms of GERD and healing erosions. Nevertheless, many patients continue to experience symptoms on withdrawal or at night. Pharmacological agents that can effectively increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure or promote motility are as yet unavailable. Although the introduction of laparoscopic techniques has resulted in a modest revival in surgical intervention using a variety of ‘wrap-type’ operations, the indications are few and the procedure is associated with a significant morbidity and even mortality especially if the expertise of the surgeon is an issue. Endoscopic techniques of regulating reflux are at this time experimental and not applicable to the general population. Intestinal metaplasia in the lower esophagus is probably very common. Whether and how to, first, screen for, and then, perform surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus remains highly problematic and contentious.

No abstract

No abstract

4508 Background: Octreotide is currently used for the control of symptoms in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, the ability of long-acting somatostatin analogues to control the growth of well-differentiated metastatic NETs is a matter of debate. The analysis of the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase IIIb study of octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic NETs of the midgut is presented. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed locally inoperable or metastasized well-differentiated NETs and a Karnofsky index >60 were randomized to receive either octreotide LAR 30 mg/month (mo) or placebo for 18 mos, or until tumor progression or death. The primary endpoint was median time to tumor progression. Secondary endpoints included objective tumor response rate (WHO criteria), measured every 3 mos, as well as symptom control and overall survival. This was a planned interim analysis using the Lan-DeMets error spending approach. Results: Eighty-five patients (n=43 octreotide LAR; n=42 placebo) have been enrolled to date and data from 67 patients with tumor progressions and 16 deaths (n=7 octreotide LAR; n=9 placebo) are included here. Median time to tumor progression in the octreotide LAR and placebo groups were 14.3 mos and 6 mos, respectively (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.59; P=0.000072). After 6 mos of treatment, stable disease was seen in 67% and 37.2% of patients treated with octreotide LAR and placebo, respectively. Due to the low number of observed deaths, median survival time could not be estimated. Conclusions: Octreotide LAR significantly lengthens median time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with metastatic NETs of the midgut. Patients treated with octreotide LAR had a 66% risk reduction of tumor progression compared with patients receiving placebo. Octreotide LAR demonstrates substantial tumor control and shows a more favorable antiproliferative response than placebo as two-thirds of patients treated with octreotide LAR achieved stable disease at 6 mos. [Table: see text]

No abstract