High homology, variant alleles, and silent alleles have made the development of completely reliable genotyping assays for the RHD and RHC alleles difficult. An RHD pseudogene (RHD w) possessing a 37-bp insertion within exon 4 is common among serologically RhD-negative individuals of African descent and generates false-positive results in previously reported RhD genotyping assays. Genotyping RhC is problematic due to exon 2 homology between RHD and RHC; however, an RHC-specific 109-bp insertion within intron 2 has been reported useful for genotyping. Primers flanking the exon 4 insertion point were used for detection of RHD and RHD w among a total of 231 serotyped individuals: 134 African American, 85 Caucasian, and 12 RhD serotype-negative/genotype-positive, D-sensitized women. Primers flanking the RHC-specific intron 2 insertion were used to genotype 282 serotyped individuals (128 African American, 154 Caucasian) and were compared to RHC genotyping using the exon 1 RhC-specific nt48 cytosine polymorphism. Complete correlation was observed between genotyping with the RHD w primer pair and serotyping among 219 individuals and 10/12 previous RHD false-positive genotyping results were resolved. RHD w was detected in 19% (n = 4/21) of RhD seronegative African Americans and 4.4% (n = 5/113) of RhD seropositive African Americans. When using the 109-bp intron 2 insertion for genotyping of RHC, a 23.9% (n = 11/46) false-negative rate was observed among African American RhCc serotyped heterozygotes. Utilization of the exon 1 nt48 cytosine for indirect genotyping of RHC yielded a 7.2% (n = 4/55) and 56.3% (n = 45/80) false-positive rate among Rhcc Caucasians and African Americans, respectively. We conclude that these additional reactions, though not sufficient alone, can be useful supplements to existing Rh genotyping assays. Am.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.