Background: Assessment of yield stability of durum wheat growing under different environments has been an important issue for wheat breeder. More Information about phenotypic stability is useful for the selection of adapted and stable genotypes which are suitable for wider range of planting.Methods: To calculate the parametric and non-parametric index, we use the program STABILITYSOFT. The aim of this study is the selection of adapted and stable genotypes based on the use of parametric and non-parametric index.Result: The graphic distribution of the genotypes tested based on the relationship between the mean grain yield and regression coefficient (bi), proved that the suitable genotypes for the tested conditions are Bidi17, Wahbi and Gta dur. The values of deviation from regression (S²di) classified the genotype Waha, as the most desirable genotypes. The Association between Wricke’s ecovalence (Wi²) indice and the grain yield proved that the best genotype for growing under these conditions are Bidi17, Wahbi and Gta dur. In addition, the non-parametric index confirmed the results which are registered by the selection based on the parametric index. Thus, the genotypes Bidi17 and Wahbi are the most stable genotypes. The classification based on the use of the principal component analysis classified the genotypes Wahbi and Bidi17 in dynamic stability group with highest grain yield. Therefore, genotypes with b values close to 1 (Wahbi, b = 0.95 and Bidi17, b = 0.98) are preferred since it is indicative of wide adaptation (dynamic stability), provided their mean yield is over the general mean. Overall, the uses of the parametric and non-parametric index are very suitable tools to select adapted and stable genotypes under sub-humid conditions.

Then a field experiment in two consecutive seasons on a farm in the Division lead to study the effectiveness of the added phosphorus spraying on the leaves and compare them added to the ground on the vegetative growth of wheat plants under conditions of Algeria, where you use three factors for phosphorus P 0 -Ps -Pr (without adding phosphorus -affixed to the ground -added spray), respectively. and massage at 50 parts / million P 2 O 5 on the image of super phosphate, and then added in two 3 / 2 amount by the Agriculture mixing with the soil and 3 / 1 the remainder after 15 days of agriculture, was also used phosphorus spraying on the leaves concentration of 1% of the sodium phosphate mono NaHPO 4 three periods after 30 -35 -40 days of agriculture, and selected two types of soil differ in physical and chemical characteristics, results showed the following: Increased the dry weight of shoot significantly by adding phosphorus to any of the methods for the treatment of comparison, regardless of the type of soil The addition of phosphorus in any of the methods to increase the number of leaves and the back in both two soil in the two phases of growth. The addition of phosphorus to the ground to the significant increase in total dry weight of roots and surpassed the values of dry weight of both shoots and roots in the soil of the first region than those in the soil of Talha. -The mutual influence between the two variables is statistically significantIncreased the total content of phosphorus in shoot dry any of the methods although the added Ground surpassed Added spraying on the leaves, but the same trend was observed for the dry weight of roots.