No abstract

Purpose To evaluate the potential impact of rebubbling on the anterior segment parameters and refractive outcomes in patients with graft detachment following uneventful DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED). Methods Retrospective institutional cohort study of comparing 34 eyes of 31 patients with rebubbling for graft detachment following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to 33 eyes of 28 patients with uneventful DMEK. Main outcome parameters were various corneal parameters obtained by Scheimpflug imaging, refractive outcome, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results Anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism, corneal densitometry, central corneal thickness, and anterior chamber depth and volume showed no significant differences. Preoperative distribution of astigmatism axis orientations showed a high proportion of anterior corneal with-the-rule astigmatism (71%) in eyes requiring rebubbling. Mean postoperative cylinder in the rebubbling group (1.21 ± 0.85 D) was significantly higher compared to the controls (p = 0.04), while differences in spherical equivalent (SE) were insignificant (p = 0.24). Postoperative CDVA was 0.11 ± 0.11 in the control group compared to 0.21 ± 0.17 in the rebubbling group (p = 0.03). Eyes with subsequent rebubbling demonstrated a significantly higher endothelial cell loss (56% versus 37%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Apart from higher cylinder values, refractive outcome and corneal parameters assessed by Scheimpflug imaging were comparable in eyes with rebubbling and controls. However, a reduced visual acuity and an increased endothelial cell loss should be taken into consideration prior to rebubbling especially in eyes with circumscribed graft detachment.

Hierzu Ta.fet It. ~chon im Jahre 1859 hat Prof. J a c o b s o n in dm~ K6nigsberger medicinischen Jahrbi~chern (Bd. I., H. 3, pag.283 ft.) das klinisehe Bild einer Krankheit gegeben, die er t{etinitis syphilitica nannte, Seine Beschreibung war so zutreffend, dass jeder I~achmaml diese Fttlle wiedererkannt hat and die Retinitis syphilitioa als besondere Krankheitsform in jedem Ha~dbueh reeipirt ist. 8p~iter hat namentiieh ~a u t h n e r in seinem Lehrbueh tier Ophthalmoseopie seine kufmerksamkeit diesel, Krankheit zugewendet und insbesondere hervorgehobe,'~, class wit unermiidtieh naeh Beweisen fiir Lugs zu forsehen haben, wenn sieh ein Fall yon Retinitis unter der Form, die er als ,,syphilitiea ~ aufftihrt, uns prttsentirt. Ieh stimme ihm hierin vollsta.ndig bei, und es wird mir immer zweifelhafter, ob tiberhaupt diese Form Yon Retinitis-namentlieh wenn man noeh einige weiter zu orSrter~d~ v, Grae%'s Arehiv fib' Op]lihalmologle XX. I: ~

No abstract

No abstract