Purpose To determine when and how to perform punctoplasty, review the history, and determine the efficacy of posterior ampullectomy. Method Retrospective analysis of 53 cases of punctal stenosis, operated by a single surgeon by means of posterior ampullectomy via 3-snips. A review of the history of the procedure from papers found with a Medline search for 1-snip, 2-snip, 3-snip, and punctoplasty. Results In all, 102 sets of notes were reviewed. The age range was from 9 to 89 years with a mean age of 56 years. A total of 74% of patients were female. We excluded 22 patients who had additional surgery and 16 patients who elected not to have surgery. There was no comment as to success or failure in four sets of notes and seven notes could not be found; these cases were also excluded. Of the remaining 53 patients, success was documented in 49 cases, or 92%. Conclusions The historical review helps explain the debate about the procedure. The retrospective review confirms that posterior ampullectomy via 3-snips is an effective procedure.
Background: Facebook is the most popular social networking site (SNS) worldwide. The growing popularity of SNSs brings 'e-professionalism' to the forefront. Aims: To assess Facebook use, publicly accessible material and awareness of privacy guidelines and online professionalism by students, foundation year doctors (FYDs) and senior staff grades (SSGs). Methods: It was an ethical risk to access publicly available information online as many users do not appreciate the lack of privacy involved, therefore a cross-sectional survey was undertaken. Participants included 42 students, 20 FYDs and 20 SSGs from the Severn Deanery (UK). Results: All 42 students and 20 FYDs had Facebook compared with 6 (30%) SSGs. Of these, 17 students (41%), 15 FYDs (75%) and 3 SSGs (50%) had public 'info pages'. 37 students (88%) reported colleagues behaving unprofessionally online with 16 FYDs (80%) but no SSGs. 32 students (76%) felt their professionalism was threatened online, alongside 18 FYDs (90%) and 2 SSGs (33%). Only 11 students (26%), 10 trainees (50%) and no SSGs were aware of guidelines. Conclusions: Professionals lack awareness of their professional vulnerability online. They are not careful in restricting access to their posted information and are not mindful that the principles of professionalism apply to SNSs.
There was an excellent response rate for a single questionnaire. Patient satisfaction with the DCR scar is very high, with the majority considering the scar invisible. Only 3% remained unhappy with the scar. Overall patient satisfaction with external DCR is very high, for the majority of patients the procedure is effective, and 85% would recommend the operation.
Intraoperative blood loss in external DCR can be reduced to a negligible level through careful patient preparation and operative technique. Minimal blood loss allows for patient comfort with DCR under local anesthesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.