SSI-guided anesthesia resulted in lower remifentanil consumption, more stable hemodynamics, and a lower incidence of unwanted events.

Retrospectively analyzed HRV of patients scheduled to undergo elective cesarean delivery during SAB showed significant differences depending on the severity of hypotension after SAB. Preliminary findings were prospectively confirmed. High LF/HF before SAB predicted severe hypotension. Preoperative HRV analysis may detect patients at risk of hypotension after SAB.

Attenuating intraoperative stress is a key factor in improving outcome. We compared neuroendocrine changes and heart rate variability (HRV) during balanced anesthesia (BAL) versus total IV anesthesia (TIVA). Forty-three patients randomly received either BAL (sevoflurane/remifentanil) or TIVA (propofol/remifentanil). Depth of anesthesia was monitored by bispectral index. Stress hormones were measured at 7 time points (P1 = baseline; P2 = tracheal intubation; P3 = skin incision; P4 = maximum operative trauma; P5 = end of surgery; P6 = tracheal extubation; P7 = 15 min after tracheal extubation). HRV was analyzed by power spectrum analysis: very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), LF/HF ratio, and total power (TP). LF/HF was higher in TIVA at P6 and TP was higher in TIVA at P3-7 (P3: 412.6 versus 94.2; P4: 266.7 versus 114.6; P5: 290.3 versus 111.9; P6: 1523.7 versus 658.1; P7: 1225.6 versus 342.6 ms2)). BAL showed higher levels of epinephrine (P7: 100.5 versus 54 pg/mL), norepinephrine (P3: 221 versus 119.5; P4: 194 versus 130.5 pg/mL), adrenocorticotropic hormone (P2 10.5 versus 7.7; P5: 5.3 versus 3.6; P6: 10.9 versus 5.3; P7: 20.5 versus 7.1 pg/mL) and cortisol (P7: 6.9 versus 3.9 microg/dL). This indicates a higher sympathetic outflow using BAL versus TIVA during ear-nose-throat surgery.

Heart rate variability analysis before SA may predict hypotension after SA with high sensitivity and specificity. LF/HF may be a tool to detect patients at high risk of hypotension due to SA. This indicates that the predictive value of LF/HF is superior to established predictors.

The CNAP monitor showed an acceptable agreement and was interchangeable with invasive pressure monitoring for MAP during normotensive conditions. During induction of anaesthesia and when the AP was low, the agreement was less good and interchangeability was not achieved. These results suggest that CNAP is not statistically equivalent to invasive monitoring during all periods of anaesthesia but may be a useful additional AP monitor.