Background: In the phase III IMpassion130 trial, combining atezolizumab with first-line nanoparticle albumin-boundpaclitaxel for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) showed a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive populations, and a clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) effect in PD-L1-positive aTNBC. The phase III KEYNOTE-355 trial adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for aTNBC showed similar PFS effects. IMpassion131 evaluated first-line atezolizumabepaclitaxel in aTNBC. Patients and methods: Eligible patients [no prior systemic therapy or 12 months since (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy] were randomised 2:1 to atezolizumab 840 mg or placebo (days 1, 15), both with paclitaxel 90 mg/m 2 (days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were tumour PD-L1 status, prior taxane, liver metastases and geographical region. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS, tested hierarchically first in the PD-L1-positive [immune cell expression 1%, VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay] population, and then in the ITT population. OS was a secondary endpoint. Results: Of 651 randomised patients, 45% had PD-L1-positive aTNBC. At the primary PFS analysis, adding atezolizumab to paclitaxel did not improve investigator-assessed PFS in the PD-L1-positive population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.12; P ¼ 0.20; median PFS 6.0 months with atezolizumabepaclitaxel versus 5.7 months with placeboepaclitaxel]. In the PD-L1-positive population, atezolizumabepaclitaxel was associated with more favourable unconfirmed best overall response rate (63% versus 55% with placeboepaclitaxel) and median duration of response (7.2 versus 5.5 months, respectively). Final OS results showed no difference between arms (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.64; median 22.1 months with atezolizumabepaclitaxel versus 28.3 months with placeboe paclitaxel in the PD-L1-positive population). Results in the ITT population were consistent with the PD-L1-positive population. The safety profile was consistent with known effects of each study drug. Conclusion: Combining atezolizumab with paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS versus paclitaxel alone. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03125902.

No abstract

Background: Pertuzumab (P) is a fully humanized investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), preventing dimerization of HER2 with other HER family members and inducing antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Its mechanisms of action are complementary to those of the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab (H) and the two antibodies combined have superior activity compared with either antibody alone in preclinical and clinical studies. In patients with advanced disease, P in combination with H has been shown to be active in patients whose disease has progressed while on H therapy (Baselga et al. J Clin Oncol 2010). Furthermore, P has been shown to improve the activity of H and docetaxel (T) in a randomized neoadjuvant study (Gianni et al. SABCS 2010, S3-2). No increase in overall toxicity and, in particular, no increase in cardiac events was observed with the addition of P to H and HT regimens. Methods: In this double-blind Phase III study patients with centrally confirmed HER2−positive metastatic or locally recurrent, unresectable breast cancer were randomized to receive either placebo+H+T or P+H+T. Patients could have received one prior hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer and/or prior systemic neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy including prior H and T. Patients had to have a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and no history of declines to <50% during or after prior H therapy. Study medication was as follows: P 840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg q3w; H 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg q3w; T 75 mg/m2 q3w (with subsequent dose escalation to 100 mg/m2 if 75 mg/m2 was well tolerated). Patients were recommended to receive at least 6 cycles of T. In the case of chemotherapy discontinuation due to cumulative toxicity, antibody therapy was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients were stratified according to region and prior treatment status (adjuvant therapy or de novo metastatic breast cancer). The primary endpoint for the study was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by independent review. The primary analysis was planned to take place when approximately 381 independently confirmed PFS events had occurred. This would provide 80% power to detect a 33% improvement in PFS (HR=0.75) at the two-sided significance level of 5%. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, investigator-determined PFS, overall response rate, duration of response, safety, and quality of life. Patient safety was monitored throughout the study by an independent data monitoring committee and a cardiac review committee. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00567190. Results: 808 patients were recruited between February 2008 and July 2010. The required number of PFS events for analysis of the primary endpoint has been reached and independent assessment PFS is currently being performed. Results of the primary analysis of efficacy and safety will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-5.

No abstract

Background HannaH (NCT00950300) compared subcutaneous and intravenous trastuzumab (H SC and H IV) as neoadjuvant–adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. The co-primary endpoints of pathological complete response (pCR) and serum trough concentration at predose cycle 8 demonstrated noninferiority between H SC and H IV. Efficacy analyses of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at a median follow-up of 40 months supported this noninferiority. Safety analyses also confirmed the consistency of the safety profile across both arms. In this final follow-up analysis, we report the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes at 5 years of treatment-free follow-up (TFFU; 6 years in total). The correlation between total pCR (tpCR; absence of invasive neoplastic cells in ipsilateral nodes and the breast) and EFS was also explored. Methods Enrolled patients (n=596; pts) were randomized to receive 4 cycles of docetaxel, then 4 cycles of 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide concurrently with 3-weekly fixed-dose 600mg H SC or H IV (loading: 8mg/kg; maintenance: 6mg/kg) in the neoadjuvant setting. Post-surgery, pts received an additional 10 cycles of H SC or H IV in the adjuvant setting to complete 1 year of anti-HER2 therapy. EFS (time from randomization to local, regional, or distant recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or death) and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were recorded and graded per standard criteria. Results In total, 297 pts were randomized to the H SC arm and 299 to the H IV arm; 294 and 297 pts were included in the respective efficacy analysis populations. Median duration of follow-up (including TFFU) was 70.8 and 71.4 months in the H SC and H IV arms, respectively. EFS and OS were similar across both study arms (Table 1). Pts who achieved tpCR had longer EFS and OS vs. those who did not (Table 1). Table 1 H SCH IVHazard Ratio (95% CI)6-year EFS, % (95% CI)n=294n=297 Overall65 (59;70)65 (60;71)0.98 (0.74;1.29)tpCR status*tpCRn=102n=90   80 (73;88)83 (75;91)  no tpCRn=158n=173   57 (49;65)61 (54;69) 6-year OS, % (95% CI)n=294n=297 Overall84 (79;88)84 (79;88)0.94 (0.61;1.45)* Efficacy per protocol population Cardiac AE incidence was low and consistent across study arms (Table 2). Table 2Pts, n (%)H SC (n=297)H IV (n=298)Any AE290 (98)282 (95)≥ Grade 3 AE158 (53)160 (54)Serious AE65 (22)45 (15)Cardiac AE44 (15)42 (14)LVEF decline (≥10%-points from baseline to <50%)11 (3.8)12 (4.2)LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction Conclusion Long-term efficacy EFS and OS results confirmed the noninferiority of H SC compared with H IV, as demonstrated by pCR and pharmacokinetic endpoints. tpCR was associated with longer EFS and OS. The overall safety profile of H SC was consistent with that of H IV. Citation Format: Jackisch C, Stroyakovskiy D, Pivot X, Ahn J-S, Melichar B, Chen S-C, Meyenberg C, Al-Sakaff N, Heinzmann D, Hegg R. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous or intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer after 5 years' treatment-free follow-up: Final analysis from the phase III, open-label, randomized HannaH study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-11.