No abstract

Background Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) mimics left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). It is treatable, but its prognosis is poor. A simple screening tool for CA would be valuable. CA is more precisely diagnosed with echocardiographic deformation parameters (e.g., relative apical sparing pattern [RASP]) than with conventional parameters. We aimed to 1) investigate incremental benefits of echocardiographic deformation parameters over established parameters for CA screening; 2) determine the resultant risk score for CA screening; and 3) externally validate the score in LVH patients. Methods We retrospectively studied 295 consecutive non-ischemic LVH patients who underwent detailed diagnostic tests. CA was diagnosed with biopsy or 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy. The base model comprised age (≥65 years [men], ≥70 years [women]), low voltage on the electrocardiogram, and posterior wall thickness ≥ 14 mm in reference to the literature. The incremental benefit of each binarized echocardiographic parameter over the base model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and comparisons of the area under the curve (AUC). Results Fifty-four (18%) patients had CA. RASP showed the most incremental benefit for CA screening over the base model. After conducting multiple logistic regression analysis for CA screening using four variables (RASP and base model components), a score was determined (range, 0–4 points). The score demonstrated adequate discrimination ability for CA (AUC = 0.86). This result was confirmed in another validation cohort (178 patients, AUC = 0.88). Conclusions We developed a score incorporating RASP for CA screening. This score is potentially useful in the risk stratification and management of LVH patients.

No abstract

Backgrounds The relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS) is frequently associated with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, the visual assessment of RASP is inconsistent, and the quantitative assessment of RASP is time‐consuming. This study aimed to compare assessments of RASP for the identification of CA with conventional assessments and investigate their reproducibility and relevance on the assessments. Methods Forty patients with biopsy‐proven CA were compared with 80 hypertrophied patients matched for mean LV wall thickness. We compared the discriminative abilities of three assessments of RASP to identify CA (visual, quantitative, and semiquantitative). Nine patterns of semiquantitative RASP were investigated; finally, it was defined as “reduction of LS” (≥ −10%) in ≥5 (of 6) basal segments, relative to “preserved LS” (< −15%) in at least one apical segment. Results The concordance between the two observers for visual RASP was modest (κ = 0.65). On the other hand, the consistency for semiquantitative RASP was perfect (κ = 1.00). The discriminative ability of semiquantitative RASP (area under the curve [AUC]  = 0.74) was significantly better than that of visual RASP (AUC = 0.65) and equivalent to that of binary quantitative RASP. Conclusion Semiquantitative RASP assessment is reproducible and accurately discriminates CA. This simple assessment may help readily refine the risk stratification of patients with diffuse LV hypertrophy.

Background The relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS) is frequently associated with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, some patients with CA do not show the RASP, and their clinical characteristics have not been fully clarified. We sought to investigate the clinical significance of RASP in patients with CA. Methods One hundred consecutive CA patients who were diagnosed by biopsy or myocardial pyrophosphate scintigraphy and evaluated for RASP (mean age: 76 years, male: 77%, LV mean wall thickness: 13.5 mm, light-chain [AL] type: 33 cases, transthyretin [TTR] type: 67 cases) were retrospectively enrolled. The RASP was semi-quantitatively and quantitatively assessed. Semi-quantitative RASP was defined as reduction of LS (≥−10%) in ≥5 (of 6) basal segments relative to preserved LS (&lt;−15%) in ≥1 apical segment. Quantitative RASP was calculated according to the following formula: Quantitative RASP = [Average apical LS] / [Average basal LS + Average mid LS]. We adapted three validated thresholds (&gt;1.00, &gt;0.90, and &gt;0.87) according to the literature. Results Semi-quantitative and binalized quantitative RASP (&gt;1.00, &gt;0.90, and &gt;0.87) were observed in 55, 55, 63, and 65 patients, respectively. RASP in each definition was more prevalent in the TTR group than in the AL group. Additionally, RASP was significantly associated with higher LV wall thickness even after adjustment for the CA subtypes (all, p&lt;0.05, Figure). After the RASP assessment, 35 all-cause deaths and 26 cardiac deaths were observed during the follow-up period (median, 1.1 years). Although these events were significantly associated with poor nutrition, lower blood pressure, higher New York Heart Association class, and the AL group, no association was found with RASP and LV wall thickness. Conclusions The incidence of RASP is low in the case of thin LV wall thickness in CA patients, which may indicate the difficulty of early diagnosis of CA using RASP in patients with mild LV hypertrophy. The prognostic prediction using RASP may be challenging in this cohort. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None