This addendum to the code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV has recently been approved by the IPEM and introduces three main changes: (i) Due to a lack of available data the original code recommended a value of unity for k(ch) in the very-low-energy range (0.035-1.0 mm Al HVL). A single table of k(ch) values, ranging from 1.01 to 1.07, applicable to both designated chamber types is now presented. (ii) For medium-energy x-rays (0.5-4 mm Cu HVL) methods are given to determine the absorbed dose to water either at 2 cm depth or at the surface of a phantom depending on clinical needs. Determination of the dose at the phantom surface is derived from an in-air measurement and by extending the low-energy range up to 4 mm Cu HVL. Relevant backscatter factors and ratios of mass energy absorption coefficients are given in the addendum. (iii) Relative dosimetry: although not normally forming part of a dosimetry code of practice a brief review of the current literature on this topic has been added as an appendix. This encompasses advice on techniques for measuring depth doses, applicator factors for small field sizes, dose fall off with increasing SSD and choice of appropriate phantom materials and ionization chambers.

An investigation has been carried out into the properties of the BANG polymer gel and its use in the dosimetry of low dose rate brachytherapy. It was discovered that the response of the gel was reproducible and linear to 10 Gy. The gel was found to be tissue equivalent with a response independent of energy to within experimental accuracy (standard error of measurement +/- 5%). The slope of the calibration curve was found to increase from 0.28 +/- 0.01 s-1 Gy-1 to 0.50 +/- 0.02 s-1 Gy-1 for an increase in monomer concentration from 6 to 9%. Absorbed dose distributions for a straight applicator containing 36 137Cs sources were measured using the gel and the results compared with measurements made with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and calculated values. Good agreement was found for the relative measurements. The root mean square residual percentage errors were 3%, 1% and 4% for the gel and the two groups of TLDs, respectively. There were some significant differences in absolute values of absorbed dose in the gel, possibly owing to the effects of oxygen. Measurements of a complex gynaecological insert were also made and compared with isodose curves from a planning system (Helax TMS), and in areas unaffected by oxygen diffusion the isodose levels from 100 to 50% agreed to within less than 0.5 mm.

United Kingdom dosimetry codes of practice have traditionally specified one electrometer for use as a secondary standard, namely the Nuclear Enterprises (NE) 2560 NPL secondary standard therapy level exposure meter. The NE2560 will become obsolete in the foreseeable future. This report provides guidelines to assist physicists following the United Kingdom dosimetry codes of practice in the selection of an electrometer to replace the NE2560 when necessary. Using an internationally accepted standard (BS EN 60731:1997) as a basis, estimated error analyses demonstrate that the uncertainty (one standard deviation) in a charge measurement associated with the NE2560 alone is approximately 0.3% under specified conditions. Following a review of manufacturers' literature, it is considered that modern electrometers should be capable of equalling this performance. Additional constructural and operational requirements not specified in the international standard but considered essential in a modern electrometer to be used as a secondary standard are presented.

The beam and performance characteristics of a new orthovoltage X-ray unit, the Pantak DXT-300 have been evaluated. Data were collated for four qualities: 3.27 mmAl, 7.15 mmAl, 1.65 mmCu and 3.51 mmCu half value layer (HVL) (SE = 0.04 mm). Parameters which were investigated included beam quality, central axis depth dose, relative output, backscatter factors, field uniformity, peripheral dose and head leakage. The calibration procedure and the performance of the dosimetry system have also been described.

No abstract