Background: The clinical course of uveal melanoma differs greatly from that of cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Twenty‐four patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (13 men and 11 women; median age at diagnosis, 56 years [range, 17–67 years]) were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Main sites of metastases were liver (87%), lung (46%), bone (29%), and skin (17%). Median relapse‐free survival time was 36 months (range, 5–240 months). Median survival time after clinical detection of metastases was 9 months (range, 1–54 months). Relapse‐free survival time was significantly greater in patients 50 years of age or younger. After manifestation of metastases, the clinical course was more favorable in patients in whom the liver was either not involved at all or not among the first sites of dissemination. These patients had a median survival time of 19 months, compared with 7 months for patients in whom the liver was involved initially. First‐line systemic treatment of metastatic disease yielded three cases of stable disease lasting 6–14 months, but no complete or partial response. Three patients received intraarterial liver perfusion as first‐ or second‐line treatment, resulting in one partial response, which lasted 6 months. Conclusion: Treatment and prognosis results of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were poor, especially when the disseminated to the liver; survival time of approximately 9 months can be expected.
Opioid-related constipation is one of the most frequent side effects of chronic pain treatment. Enteral administration of naloxone blocks opioid action at the intestinal receptor level but has low systemic bioavailability due to marked hepatic first-pass metabolism. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of oral naloxone on opioid-associated constipation in an intraindividually controlled manner. Twenty-two chronic pain patients with oral opioid treatment and constipation were enrolled in this study. Constipation was defined as lack of laxation and/or necessity of laxative therapy in at least 3 out of 6 days. Laxation and laxative use were monitored for the first 6 days without intervention ('control period'). Then, oral naloxone was started and titrated individually between 3x3 to 3x12 mg/day depending on laxation and withdrawal symptoms. After the 4-day titration period, patients were observed for further 6 days ('naloxone period'). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare number of days with laxation and laxative therapy in the two study periods. Of the 22 patients studied, five patients did not reach the 'naloxone period' due to death, operation, systemic opioid withdrawal symptoms, or therapy-resistant vomiting. In the 6 day 'naloxone' compared to the 'control period', the mean number of days with laxation increased from 2.1 to 3.5 (P<0.01) and the number of days with laxative medication decreased from 6 to 3.8 (P<0.01). The mean naloxone dose in the 'naloxone period' was 17.5 mg/day. The mean pain intensity did not differ between these two periods. Moderate side effects of short duration were observed in four patients following naloxone single dose administrations between 6 and 20 mg, resulting in yawning, sweating, and shivering. Most of the patients reported mild or moderate abdominal propulsions and/or abdominal cramps shortly after naloxone administration. All side effects terminated after 0.5-6 h. This controlled study demonstrates that orally administered naloxone improves symptoms of opioid associated constipation and reduces laxative use. To prevent systemic withdrawal signs, therapy should be started with low doses and patients carefully monitored during titration.
Bendamustine, an alkylating agent without cross-resistance to cyclophosphamide is active in a variety of lymphoproliferative and other malignancies. In an open phase-II study we treated 23 patients with a median age of 62 years at study entry (43-86 years) with advanced, refractory or relapsed (Rai stage III n = 9, Rai stage IV n = 14) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with bendamustine. At study entry, only 13 patients were chemotherapy-naive. The treatment schedule with bendamustine was as follows: for patients up to 70 years 60 mg/m2 for 5 days, for patients over 70 years 50 mg/m2 for 5 days, repetition at day 29. Remission criteria were used according to Cheson et al. (1996). All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 20 for response. An objective remission was achieved in 15/20 patients (75%), including six patients with complete remission (CR). Three of the complete responders had no chemotherapy prior to bendamustine. No change (NC) occurred in 5/20 patients (25%). Median overall survival after bendamustine treatment is 13.6 months (1-46 months) and 16.6 months (1-46 months) in patients responding to bendamustine. In total, 74 courses of bendamustine were applied. Therapy-related anemia and thrombocytopenia were rare. However, WHO grade III/IV leukocytopenia occurred in 38/74 cycles (51%), resulting in treatment-related mortality in 3/23 patients (13%). These patients were severely immunocompromised due to pretreatment or the underlying disease. As a corollary of the study, a general prophylactic antibiotic treatment (trimethoprim/ sulfamerazine) was instituted. A general feature was the decline of the CD4/CD8 ratio: mean before therapy: 1.36; after two courses: 0.98; after four courses: 0.6, as documented in all patients who received at least two courses of bendamustine (n = 12). All evaluable patients showed a decline in the CD4/8 ratio. However, this decline was not clearly related to an increased risk of infectious episodes. We observed mainly cutaneous allergic reactions (three WHO grade I; one WHO grade II) leading to a cessation of bendamustine treatment in 4/23 patients (18%). Bendamustine is highly effective in advanced or refractory CLL. In multiple pretreated or otherwise severely immunocompromised patients bendamustine might lead to additional immunosuppression with subsequent infectious complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.