The temporal relationship between the solar wind and magnetospheric activity has been studied using 34 intervals of high time resolution IMP 8 solar wind data and the corresponding AL auroral activity index. The median values of the AL index for each interval were utilized to rank the intervals according to geomagnetic activity level. The linear prediction filtering technique was then applied to model magnetospheric response as measured by the AL index to the solar wind input function VB s. The linear prediction filtering routine produces a filter of time-lagged response coefficients which estimates the most general linear relationship between the chosen input and output parameters of the magnetospheric system. It is found that the filters are composed of two response pulses speaking at time lags of 20 and 60 min. The amplitude of the 60-min pulse is the larger for moderate activity levels, while the 20-min pulse is the larger for strong activity levels. A possible interpretation is that the 20-min pulse represents magnetospheric activity driven directly by solar wind coupling and that the 60-min pulse represents magnetospheric activity driven by the release of energy previously stored in the magnetotail. If this interpretation is correct, the linear filtering results suggest that both the driven and the unloading models of magnetospheric response are inportant facets of a more comprehensive response model.

We use a comprehensive set of data collected from space-borne instruments and from ground-based facilities to estimate the energy deposition associated with the three major magnetospheric sinks during the event. It is found that averaged over the 2-day period, the total magnetospheriC energy deposition rate is about 400 GW, with 190 GW going into Joule heating rate, 120 GW into ring current injection, and 90 GW into auroral precipitation. By comparison, the average solar wind electromagnetic energy transfer rate as represented by the e parameter is estimated to be 460 GW, and the average available solar wind kinetic power Usw is about 11,000 GW. A good linear correlation is found between the AE index and various ionospheric parameters such as the cross-polar-cap potential drop, hemisphere-integrated Joule heating rate, and hemisphere-integrated auroral precipitation. In the northern hemisphere where the data coverage is extensive, the proportionality factor is 0.06 kV/nT between the potential drop and AE, 0.25 GW/nT between Joule heating rate and AE, and 0.13 GW/nT between auroral precipitation and AE. However, different studies have resulted in different proportionality factors. One should therefore be cautious when using empirical formulas to estimate the ionospheric energy deposition. There is an evident saturation of the cross-polar-cap potential drop for large AE (•1000 nT), but further studies are needed to confirm this.•High Altitude Observatory, NCAR, Boulder, Colorado.

In an attempt to place short-lived, high-speed magnetotail flows termed bursty bulk flow events (BBFs) in the context of substorm phenomenology we analyze one such event that took place on April 11, 1985, using data from several spacecraft and many ground stations. The substorm onset, which took place at 0127 UT, had a meridian 2 hours of local time east of AMPTE/IRM. The satellite did not detect high-speed flows at that time. A high-latitude (--•70 ø corrected geomagnetic) substorm intensification took place at 0202 UT centered --•0.5 hour of local time west of the AMPTE/IRM meridian. The ISEE 2 satellite at the magnetotail lobe and the LANL 019 satellite at geosynchronous altitude were both at the same meridian as AMPTE/IRM at the time. The 0202 UT substorm intensification was associated with (1) a dipolarization at the ISEE 2 satellite at 0200:30 UT, (2) a BBF onset at AMPTE/IRM at 0202 UT accompanied by an intense dipolarization consistent with current wedge formation, (3) an energetic particle injection at geosynchronous altitude that took place at 0204 UT. The plasma acceleration region associated with this substorm intensification was estimated to be --• 8 R E tailward of AMPTE/IRM. Thus, during this activity the BBF event was due to an observed tail collapse Earthward of X --• -26 RE. The Earthward energy transport measured at AMPTE/IRM can account for the expected magnetospheric power consumption if the BBF has a cross-sectional area of only 1-2 R2e in the Y-Z direction. Similarly, the Earthward magnetic flux transport rate measured at AMPTE/IRM during the BBF event can result in a potential drop comparable to the expected transpolar cap potential if the BBF event has a size of 1-2 R E in the Y direction. The large amounts of flux transport measured past the satellite necessitate the existence of lobe flux reconnection tailward of AMPTE/IRM. The above results assume the validity of the frozen-in condition over the --•10-min duration of the BBF event.Although activity continued in the ionosphere and the ring current for well over 1.5 hours after the 0202 UT substorm intensification, most of the earthward energy and magnetic flux transport past IRM had ceased --•10 min after the BBF onset. We propose that the fast flows transport and pile up magnetic flux through a very narrow (a few R E in Y extent) flow channel in the midtail to the edge of an expanding dipolarization front in the near-Earth region. After the plasma sheet dipolarizes at a given location enhanced flux transport ceases, resulting in an apparent short (10-min timescale) duration of the fast flows. Unlike the near-Earth plasma sheet, which dipolarizes across many hours of local time, the midtail plasma sheet may exhibit longitudinally localized dipolarization. This may explain the often observed lack of one-to-one correlation between midtail activity and substorms.

[1] Cluster fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) and ion spectrometer (CIS) data are employed to analyze magnetic field fluctuations within the plasma sheet during passages through the magnetotail region in the summers of 2001 and 2002 and, in particular, to look for characteristics of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence. Power spectral indices determined from power spectral density functions are on average larger than Kolmogorov's theoretical value for fluid turbulence as well as Kraichnan's theoretical value for MHD plasma turbulence. Probability distribution functions of the magnetic fluctuations show a scaling law over a large range of temporal scales with non-Gaussian distributions at small dissipative scales and inertial scales and more Gaussian distribution at large driving scales. Furthermore, a multifractal analysis of the magnetic field components shows scaling behavior in the inertial range of the fluctuations from about 20 s to 13 min for moments through the fifth order. Both the scaling behavior of the probability distribution functions and the multifractal structure function suggest that intermittent turbulence is present within the plasma sheet. The unique multispacecraft aspect and fortuitous spacecraft spacing allow us to examine the turbulent eddy scale sizes. Dynamic autocorrelation and cross correlation analysis of the magnetic field components allow us to determine that eddy scale sizes fit within the plasma sheet. These results suggest that magnetic field turbulence is occurring within the plasma sheet resulting in turbulent energy dissipation.