The local analgesic efficacy of a cream formulation of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) in reducing pain at venous cannulation was investigated in children scheduled for elective surgery. Forty children participated in a double-blind, randomized comparison between EMLA and inactive placebo cream. Another group of 18 children without any local treatment was studied as an additional control material. Subjective pain scores, expressed with a visual analogue scale, were significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with both the group treated with placebo cream (P less than 0.001) and the open control group (no cream; P less than 0.01). Local pallor and slight oedema were the only side-effects, registered in both cream-treated groups. A preliminary study was also carried out with 10 children (five with EMLA and five without) in order to determine whether catecholamine and vasopressin levels in venous blood are affected by the stress and anxiety associated with venepuncture in children premedicated with oral flunitrazepam. No significant hormone responses were, however, detected. The lidocaine concentrations measured in venous blood taken from the application site of EMLA cream were low, and there were no measurable levels of lidocaine in simultaneous blood samples from the opposite extremity. In our opinion EMLA cream is safe and alleviates effectively the pain associated with venepuncture, and thus deserves a place in the routine premedication of children.

Four different pain treatments (single intercostal block with bupivacaine, repeated intercostal block, epidural morphine and epidural bupivacaine infusions) were compared in 39 patients subjected to lung surgery under general anaesthesia. The patients' own estimate of the postoperative pain was not significantly different between the groups, but the epidurally treated patients required fewer doses of supplementary analgesic than those given just a single dose of intercostal bupivacaine. Bupivacaine levels in blood were below the toxic range in all groups. The concentration of antidiuretic hormone in blood was increased early during the operation, and had only partly returned to normal on the first postoperative morning. Growth hormone in plasma was increased only at the end of the operation. Catecholamine levels in blood increased gradually, reaching their peak postoperatively. There were only slight differences between the groups in these posterior and anterior pituitary and sympatho-adrenal responses to surgical stress. Thus, neither repeated intercostal blockade nor epidural administration of morphine or bupivacaine could prevent the endocrine responses to thoracic surgery, in spite of significant, albeit incomplete, pain relief. This was probably caused in part by residual pain, and also by poor access of the extradural medications to the autonomic afferent pathways mediating nociceptive signals from thoracic organs and tissues.

No abstract